Feeds

IBM to outsource thousands of euphemisms

Don't say the O-word

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

IBM has warned staff not to use the word "off-shore" when it starts to move white collar jobs from the US to China, India and Brazil this year, the Wall Street Journal reports today.

"Do not be transparent regarding the purpose/intent" of the moves, IBM advises, and "on-shore" and "off-shore" should never be used.

Gartner has estimated that one in ten white collar IT jobs will be moved oversees by the end of this year, and last month the WSJ reported 4,730 US programmers in IBM's Global Services group would be replaced. Today's report is based on internal discussion documents from last Fall, and has little new to add in terms of concrete plans. We do learn, however, that while IBM bills internal developers at $56 an hour, a Chinese programmer with three to fiver years' experience is billed at around $12.50 an hour.

In response, IBM has confirmed it will send 3,000 programmer jobs offshore this year, although it will add 5,000 net in the United States. Its global headcount will be its highest since 1991.

Meanwhile state senators in Washington, home to Microsoft and Boeing, have proposed legislation that would prevent the State from employing offshore contractors. Also on the agenda is a bill that would require call center employees to disclose their location if requested, and prevent employers from using staff earmarked for redundancy to train their offshore replacements. Four other states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey have similar legislation under consideration.

It's election year, and lawmakers who ignore the issue do so at their peril. However two major companies have superficially acknowledged customer concerns. Lehmann Brothers recently switched its IT helpdesk away from its Indian call center, and Dell Computer re-routed US support calls on two product lines back to the United States. However both have large investments in India and remain committed to the operations.

It's hard to think what euphemisms IBM can use instead of "offshore". Seaward? Man overboard? If you can do better, let us know

Related Stories

Intel CEO admits: jobs aren't coming back to US
In praise of outsourcing
IBM mulls sending engineer jobs to India
US tech industry staff decimated in offshore stampede

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up Big Data
Solving backup challenges and “protect everything from everywhere,” as we move into the era of big data management and the adoption of BYOD.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?