Feeds

Stroppy emails make you sick: official

Inbox open, blood pressure up

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Boffins at Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College have proven what Reg readers doubless already know - that aggresive emails are bad for your health.

The eggheads monitored volunteers as they opened their inboxes, finding that threatening missives - or those from a work superior - raised the guinea pigs' blood pressure alarmingly.

Interestingly, even a perfectly reasonable email from the boss seemed sufficient to induce semi-panic, and a written ear-bashing eminating from management constituted the biggest health threat. "Although participants' blood pressure rose to some degree after reading the threatening email and the e-mail from a superior, the highest increase was seen in those reading an e-mail which was both threatening and from a higher status colleague," noted researcher Howard Taylor.

This pretty obvious conclusion indicates that the use of email - by virtue of its impersonality and distance - encourages people to vent their spleen uninhibited by the social norms which govern other forms of communication.

So, if giving someone some stick over the phone might earn you an earful back, or mouthing off to a person's face could result in a slap, sending an email has neither of these immediate and undesirable consequences.

The Vulture Central mailbox pretty well confirms this - the worst offenders being those obstreperous correspondants using pseudonymous Hotmail addresses to transmit vitriol through the ether with impunity.

None of which affects our blood pressure of course: Reg hacks have nerves of steel and livers of iron. This is, however, cold comfort to those poor souls who are increasingly afraid to open their inboxes at all. As Professor Cary Cooper of Lancaster University puts it: "E-mail is not a social support for us anymore - it's more like a source of stress."

So, angry people and bosses take note: it costs nothing to be polite and if you can't say it to a person's face, it's probably better not to hit that send button at all. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.