Feeds

BT ordered to stop ‘dirty tricks’

Phone switching grief

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

BT has been ordered to stop using "dirty tricks" to persuade customers from switching phone providers.

In a ruling published today, Oftel upheld a complaint from Thus and Broadsystem Ventures Ltd, and so preventing BT from using information about the transfer of customers to alternative telecoms suppliers such as One.Tel, Tiscali and Tele2.

Oftel found that the UK's dominant telco was using this information for illegal marketing activity.

In a statement Oftel explained: "Until now, BT has passed this [transfer] information to its marketing department, which has then contacted the customer to try and persuade them to stay with BT. Oftel has today ordered BT to stop carrying out this practice, on the grounds that it is forbidden under the new EU Access and Interconnection Directive that came into force in the UK in July 2003."

Alternative telco Thus said it welcomed Oftel's move against "BT dirty tricks" and urged the regulator - soon to be replaced by new communications regulator Ofcom - to "remain vigilant" about BT's competitive behaviour.

But the monster telco lashed out at the ruling and vowed to appeal. It condemned Oftel's move as an "ill-conceived move that will cause widespread confusion for customers".

It warned that unless BT is able to contact customers, it could open the floodgates for 'slamming', a process where customers are switched phone providers without their knowledge or consent.

Said BT Retail chief exec Pierre Danon in a statement: "This decision makes no sense for the customer. Phone customers are only just getting over the confusion caused by Oftel's handling of the 192 switch-off. Now they will be getting more of the same.

"This will break an important link with our customers, which will not be in their best interest or ours. We will not be able to call a customer until they have left and they may not be clear which services have been terminated. The potential for confusion is huge." ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Facebook, Google and Instagram 'worse than drugs' says Miley Cyrus
Italian boffins agree with popette's theory that haters are the real wrecking balls
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.