Feeds

Borland: you only live thrice

Catch the third wave

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

The CEO of Borland Software believes the company is ready to catch its "third-wave".

While observers have widely debated whether Microsoft, nearing the end of its 20s, is entering corporate middle age, CEO Dale Fuller says Borland is nowhere near a mid-life crisis and is instead moving into a new era of innovation. But there are a couple of immediate challenges facing the company, including sales difficulties and the threat from open source.

At 20, Borland is indeed entering its third incarnation. After creating Rapid Application Development (RAD) tools for Windows, then flirting with near extinction as Inprise, application lifecycle management (ALM) earmarks Borland's latest life chapter, a strategy that integrates modeling, design, build, rollout and maintenance of software.

Borland faces at least two immediate challenges, in this, its third era. The first is internal. A year after acquiring TogetherSoft, BoldSoft MDE and Starbase and integrating their products with JBuilder X to create Enterprise Studio 7.0 for Java, the ALM message is taking longer than expected to filter down to the sales people.

"How do you translate that [integration] to some sales guy who is selling a Java tool. That's the translation that's taken a much longer time," said Mr Fuller.

As such, Borland last quarter issued a profit warning followed by a $12.1 million loss, resulting in 125 staff redundancies, including the director of sales for the US Eastern Region.

The company followed this by resurrecting the post of head of sales, a position eliminated after Mr Fuller came to power. Former EDS and Cadence Design Systems executive Matt Thompson was recently appointed Borland's vice president of worldwide sales.

Borland's longer-term threat comes from the encroaching presence of open source, especially the IBM Corp-backed Eclipse tools framework. Open source undercuts vendors like Borland on price.

In the case of Eclipse, the framework, while nominally independent, is geared around creating a tools framework that expands the functionality of IBM's WebSphere Studio Java IDE. IBM is one of Borland's biggest Java IDE competitors.

Eclipse itself has arguably helped accelerate the commoditization of the software tools market, making it difficult for ISVs to compete on cost of development. It's a fact that helped put WebGain Inc out of business last year.

Source: Computerwire/Datamonitor

Related Research
The Web Services Outlook

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Linux turns 23 and Linus Torvalds celebrates as only he can
No, not with swearing, but by controlling the release cycle
Scratched PC-dispatch patch patched, hatched in batch rematch
Windows security update fixed after triggering blue screens (and screams) of death
This is how I set about making a fortune with my own startup
Would you leave your well-paid job to chase your dream?
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.