Feeds

Napster 2.0 goes live

The cat's back

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

Napster goes live today, segueing from the beta release launched earlier this month into a fully fledged version 2.0, whose only real connection with the infamous file swapping service of yore is the headphoned cat logo.

Like Apple's iTunes Music Store, which provided the template for the new service, Napster 2.0 offers downloads for 99 cents a song or $9.95 for a whole album's worth, with 30s previews of each song available for punters who want to try before they buy.

Users can also watch music videos, transfer songs to portable music players and burn tracks to CD. Song for burning have to be added to a playlist, and each playlist can be burned only five times - half as many as ITMS' ten.

The service claims to have over 500,000 songs to choose from, encoded in Windows Media 9 format, which also provides the service with its DRM technology. Don't lose your downloads - Napster won't give you a free replacement: "It is your responsibility not to lose, destroy or damage them. Napster shall have no liability to you in the event of any such loss, destruction, or damage," says its Ts&Cs.

Curiously, the service also offers "the ability to send music to friends both within and outside of the service". It will be interesting to see how this works, particularly since it appears to run contrary to Napster's own Ts&Cs: "You may not authorize, encourage or allow any Tracks or Materials used or obtained by you to be reproduced, modified, displayed, performed, transferred, distributed or otherwise used by anyone else."

As with other US services, Napster content is not available to any living overseas.

Finally, in a nod toward the original legal online music services, Napster offers a subscription service, for $9.95 a month, which adds 40 "commercial-free" radio stations, additional "community features" - chat options, presumably - but crucially unlimited downloads and streaming.

Roxio, Napster's owner, lost $11.9 million in its last fiscal quarter on sales of $22.8 million, so presumably it's hoping all those $9.95 subs will help bring it back into the black. ®

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.