Feeds

SCO says GPL unenforceable, unconstitutional and void

Gloves off

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

The SCO Group has described the General Public License, the cornerstone of much free software, as "unenforceable, void or voidable" in its latest court filing.

The document is a response to IBM's Amended Counter Claims; IBM is counter-suing the SCO Group, claiming that it violates the terms of the GPL. SCO's response, filed on Friday, argues that the case be dismissed with costs awarded against IBM, and makes twenty six counter-counter-claims.

"IBM’s claims are barred by fraud, illegality, collusion, conspiracy and/or lack of clean hands," claims SCO. The cornerstone of SCO's defense follows:

"The General Public License ("GPL") is unenforceable, void and/or voidable, and IBM’s claims based thereon, or related thereto, are barred… The GPL is selectively enforced by the Free Software Foundation such that enforcement of the GPL by IBM or others is waived, stopped or otherwise barred as a matter of equity." Elsewhere it denies the "applicability or enforceability of the GPL."

And to top it off, indulging in software libre is an un-American activity:

"The GPL violates the U.S. Constitution, together with copyright, antitrust and export control laws, and IBM’s claims based thereon, or related thereto, are barred."

In the past, SCO has contributed code to GPL products, and continues to distribute them.

Elswhere, SCO says that four patents which IBM claims it infringed are "or may not be" valid. It also admits that UNIX™ was "originally developed by Bell Laboratories."

The GPL has never been tested in court and its first real test has caused concern. Eben Moglen, pro bono attorney for the FSF, told us he was confident that SCO's case would be thrown out. ®

Related Link

SCO Group's Answer to IBM Amended Counter Claims [PDF - 224kb]

Related Stories

GPL goes to court
The GPL will win, claims law prof
Against SCO’s GPL jihad: one size doesn't fit all

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Munich considers dumping Linux for ... GULP ... Windows!
Give a penguinista a hug, the Outlook's not good for open source's poster child
Intel's Raspberry Pi rival Galileo can now run Windows
Behold the Internet of Things. Wintel Things
Linux Foundation says many Linux admins and engineers are certifiable
Floats exam program to help IT employers lock up talent
Microsoft cries UNINSTALL in the wake of Blue Screens of Death™
Cache crash causes contained choloric calamity
Eat up Martha! Microsoft slings handwriting recog into OneNote on Android
Freehand input on non-Windows kit for the first time
Linux kernel devs made to finger their dongles before contributing code
Two-factor auth enabled for Kernel.org repositories
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.