Feeds

Open Text: big, bigger, biggest

Now is the winter of our content

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Canadian software maker Open Text is offering a friendly bid of around $233 million to buy Ixos Software. By merging, the two companies hope to create the world's largest enterprise content management software vendor, and defend their positions against their fast-growing rivals.

If its proposed acquisition of Ixos goes through, Open Text faces the usual challenges of picking through the overlaps of the two product sets to present a coherent single offering to the market. Software companies are difficult (and costly) to integrate and it remains to be seen how a Canadian company that plans to run a large part of its business from Chicago will meld with a German company almost the same size. However, having successfully absorbed 20 or so software companies in the past no other firm in the industry perhaps has greater experience in this respect. Ixos too has recently absorbed two technology-based acquisitions - buying Swiss ECM company Obtree Technologies and German workflow vendor PowerWork at the beginning of this year.

Admittedly Ixos will be a big financial nut for Open Text to swallow, and its impact on Open Text is unclear at this stage. Some financial analysts watching the deal believe that if the bulk of Ixos' shareholders choose to receive Open Text stock, then Open Text's EPS will show minimal growth due to the resulting dilution, and that Open Text's overall growth rate will suffer by adding the slow-growing Ixos to its revenue mix. Nevertheless, Ixos' snail-like growth rate must be weighed against the added 'heft' it brings to Open Text, not to mention an expanded customer base.

Ultimately, Open Text's takeover shows how consolidation continues unabated in all sectors of the enterprise software market. Open Text's move comes a week after storage giant EMC tabled a $1.7 billion bid for California-based content management provider Documentum, leading some analysts to question Open Text's ability to defend its position in the market against bigger players. Indeed, Open Text's move is largely a reaction to such market consolidation, although it denies it was a response to EMC's Documentum bid in particular.

Source: Computerwire/Datamonitor

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.