Fujitsu HDD fiasco to end in $42.5m pay-out

Defendants settle out of court

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Lawyers fighting a class action brought against Fujitsu, HP, Gateway and others over allegedly faulty hard drives have successfully forced the defendants to settle out of court.

The settlement centres on the foundation of a $42.5 million pool of cash to be used to pay "any consumers and other end users who bought certain Fujitsu desktop 3.5in IDE hard disk drives or personal computers or other systems containing these hard disk drives", according to papers filed with the California Superior Court in Santa Clara.

The lawsuit, launched last year, alleged that the drives, supplied by Fujitsu and included in systems sold by the other defendants, contained faulty chips and firmware bugs that caused the drives to fail and lose data. The suit also claimed Fujitsu and its partners knew about the problem but sold the drives anyway, and "misled end users about the product".

The action was brought by US legal firm Shepherd Finklemann Miller & Shah (SFMS) and centred on Fujitsu's MPG3xx family of drives. Last October, SFMS lodged its complaint with the US Supreme Court, naming Fujitsu (obviously), but also HP (as the seller of the Pavilion 7845 PC, which the complain states contained MPG3xx drives) and 100 other unnamed defendants, presumably US PC makers. Gateway was named as a defendant this past June.

The story - quickly dubbed the 'Great Fujitsu HDD Fiasco' - starts back in September 2002, when Japanese newswires, along with Bloomberg, reported that Fujitsu was recalling 300,000 hard drives in Japan. The drives, made between September 2000 and September 2001, contain a faulty controller chip, Fujitsu told Bloomberg at the time.

It quickly emerged that the drives were to be found in PCs in Europe and the US, as well as Japan, though Fujitsu later said that there was no recall programme in place.

To this day, the defendants admit no liability and deny the claims detailed in the suit. They have agreed to the settlement simply to end the legal action brought against them.

At this stage, the settlement is a proposal, and the Court is asking for interested parties to submit claims or to write and object to the settlement. The terms of the agreement involve the payment of $45 per HDD to class members who can prove that they owned one of the faulty drives in question and incurred expenses to replace it/them.

Anyone who claims they lost data can submit a statement to that effect to the Court and, after offering "proof that the Settlement Administrator may reasonably require", be entitled to up to $1200 per HDD.

In the meantime, a hearing has been scheduled for 2 March 2004 at which the Court will approve the settlement, providing there are no significant objections from interested parties. ®

Full terms of the settlement can be downloaded here

Related Stories

Gateway named in Fujitsu HDD class action suit
Fujitsu admits 4.9 million (potentially) defective HDDs
Fujitsu faces lawsuits over HDD failures
Wallop! Fujitsu Europe fudges HDD recall
Crash! Dud Fujitsu HDDs all over UK
PCA publishes Fujitsu HDD advisory
Ouch! Fujitsu to replace 300,000 faulty HDDs


Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.