Feeds

VIA to unveil world's smallest x86 chip

By package, not die

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

VIA will today take the wraps off a more compact version of its Eden embedded processor, the Eden-N, which it claims is the world's smallest x86 chip. Built into a "nanoBGA" package, the processor measures just 1.5 x 1.5cm.

Like VIA's 130nm C3 line of desktop and notebook processors, the Eden-N is based on the company's Nehemiah x86 core. The new chip features an updated version of that architecture which adds a second hardware random number generator and adds an AES acceleration engine which VIA claims encrypts data at up to 12.5Gbps at 1GHz - more than eight times faster than the "best" software-based AES encoder for the 3GHz Pentium 4.

Both components are bundled into VIA's PadLock security technology, which uses on-chip electrical noise as the basis for its random number seed.

The Nehemiah core is based on a 16-stage pipeline and includes a full-speed floating-point unit and support for Intel's SSE instructions. It contains 64KB of on-die L2 cache.

The Eden-N will ship clocked to 533MHz, 800MHz and 1GHz, with typical power consumption ratings of 4W, 6W and 7W, respectively. That's comparable to both Transmeta's TM5800 and Intel's Ultra-low Voltage Pentium.

The VIA Eden-N processor is sampling now and is expected to start appearing in products during Q1 2004. ®

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.