Feeds

FCC must treat cable firms the same as telcos

Not a happy regulator

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

Why is it that all the Telco DSL providers in the US work hand in glove with ISP’s, but so few of the cable TV companies deliver their services through ISPs?

Much of it has to do with the FCC having made a ruling that said that the cable firms are a completely different kettle of fish and are not categorized as communications companies, but as information providers.

Although there is no mandate forcing Telcos to offer open access to ISPs, history has taught them that failure to do so would probably result in them being ordered to. As a result the US Telcos have enlisted the help of ISPs to up their market penetration.

Cable firms have been able to ignore ISPs because of their previously privileged status, more or less outside of the FCC remit.

A US court has now called that decision into question in the Court of Appeals, potentially handing a victory to the ISPs after their legal actions have brought the matter to light.

The only stumbling block is that the FCC plans to appeal the decision, strangely suggesting that this decision in some way interferes with its aim to develop a national policy on highspeed Internet services.

Surely the opposite is true. When two vested interests offer the same service, it makes sense that they are encumbered with the same rules, but the US cable TV companies have often enjoyed better treatment at the hands of the FCC than their now arch-rivals, the local
telephone operators.

The court decision was not definitive, but it re-ranked cable broadband in the same category as
DSL delivered broadband and the FCC must treat it in the same way when making new rules.

The FCC had cable TV down as information providers which are subject to far less stringent regulation.

The FCC will now have to decide how to treat both telephone operators and cable firms and may now need to open up access to ISPs and other competitors, to their networks. At the moment the FCC stance is that it will use any carrot to get network operators to upgrade their networks and offer more advanced services. It feels that cable operators have made the shift to digital networks, and that Telcos have dragged their heels.

© Copyright 2003 Rethink Research

But the only reason that cable operators have made expensive upgrades is due to the reward of being able to offer three services over them, TV, local phone connections and high speed internet lines, not because they are in accord with the FCC’s aim to upgrade US networks.

Some cable companies have seen the decision coming and have begun to invite participation into their networks anyway, with Comcast opening its doors to America Online and Earthlink, as well as local ISPs.

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
It may be ILLEGAL to run Heartbleed health checks – IT lawyer
Do the right thing, earn up to 10 years in clink
France bans managers from contacting workers outside business hours
«Email? Mais non ... il est plus tard que six heures du soir!»
prev story

Whitepapers

Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
HP ArcSight ESM solution helps Finansbank
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.