Feeds

VeriSign slammed for domain renewal scam

But FTC accepts it didn’t break the law

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

VeriSign has been rapped over the knuckles by the FTC for its calculated attempt to steal domains from competitors - a practice called "slamming".

However in a ruling by the government arm, VeriSign was found not to have broken the law and so avoided a hefty fine. It has however been barred from suggesting that someone’s domain is about to expire or that what is in fact a transfer is no more than a renewal.

It has also been ordered to compensate anyone that was tricked by the underhand tactic.

Last year, the registrar that runs the .com and .net domains infuriated other domain registrars and consumers alike when it sent out ambiguous emails informing people their domain was about to expire and they needed to click on a link to renew it. A hard-to-see VeriSign logo was the only indication that the email wasn’t from the company the domain was currently
registered with.

Thousands “renewed” their domains but in many cases it was months or even years until the domain was due to expire and in each case the individual unwittingly transferred their domain to VeriSign - normally always at a higher price.

The emails saw an immediate legal response from the main two registrars affected - GoDaddy and BulkRegister, who swiftly won an injunction - and
also saw several class action lawsuits from duped consumers, now settled in their favour.

This is not the first time VeriSign has abused its powerful position in the domain market in order to frustrate efforts to turn its once monopoly into a
competitive market. Last week, its SiteFinder program directed most non-existent domains to its own webpage, sparking an immediate lawsuit and an angry request by ICANN to switch it off, which it has continued to
ignore.

As ever though, the company is unrepentant. "This matter relates to a marketing campaign that was discontinued over a year ago," it said in a statement following the ruling. "VeriSign cooperated fully with the FTC and is pleased to have this matter resolved."

Plus ca change... ®

Related link
FTC notice

Related stories
FTC probes VeriSign over slamming claims
Verisign accused of DNS slamming

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.