Feeds

Mike Chatha re: xbox.ws

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Letter re: Microsoft in reasonable Net action shocker!

From: Mike Chatha

Thanks for covering this story, but I'm afraid I should point out some inaccuracies which you may wish to correct:

1) We don't even own XBOX.US.COM - see the registrar's website at http://www.centralnic.com/register.php?op=search&domain=xbox where the domain has always been on sale. I believe at one time I did think about acquiring it but changed my mind before purchasing it. This is a fair indication that MS has not properly checked its facts. Of course it is pretty difficult to be accused of selling something that I don't even own! We have not yet notified MS of this fact, as if the matter did end up in court it would probably work in our favour.

2) Microsoft WERE aware that we were operating the XBOX.WS site, as a year or so ago I tried to register XBOX.BIZ . We listed the successful existence of XBOX.WS as a justification for owning and operating XBOX.BIZ, on the grounds that there had been no previous objections by MS. MS finally won this domain via the internal procedure provided by the the BIZ registrar. This goes to show that MS must have been aware of the existence of the XBOX.WS site for quite some time, and evidently had no objection to it.

3) My primary intention was, and continues to be, to develop a games portal on XBOX.WS . We are some way down the road to planning this site and forming the necessary partnerships, and parting with the domain will not help at all.

4) Microsoft are aware of this intention, and only contacted us when we put a notice on the site referring to the number of visitors we were getting. Their lawyers termed this amount of traffic as 'substantial' and raised the point that we were taking traffic away from XBOX.COM .

5) We already have already responded to the MS lawyers by letter on Sep 1st expressing our regret etc, restating our intentions to run a games portal, and inviting them to a meeting to discuss the matter further. We also asked them to provide suitable wording for the site copyright notice, which we would be happy to update. So far, we have heard no response.

thanks

Mike ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
WRISTJOB LOVE BONANZA: justWatch sex app promises blind date hookups
Mankind shuffles into the future, five fingers at a time
Oi, London thief. We KNOW what you're doing - our PRECRIME system warned us
Aye, shipmate, it be just like that Minority Report
Every billionaire needs a PANZER TANK, right? STOP THERE, Paul Allen
Angry Microsoftie hauls auctioneers to court over stalled Pzkw. IV 'deal'
Oz carrier Tiger Air takes terror alerts to new heights
Don't doodle, it might cost you your flight
Apple's Mr Havisham: Tim Cook says dead Steve Jobs' office has remained untouched
'I literally think about him every day' says biz baron's old friend
Cops apologise for leaving EXPLOSIVES in suitcase at airport
'Canine training exercise' SNAFU sees woman take home booming baggage
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.