The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Nortel faces $30-40m restructuring charge

There may be trouble ahead

Free whitepaper – Avoiding costs from oversizing data center and network room infrastructure

Nortel Networks plans to take a hit of between $30 million and $40 million in restructuring charges this year, according to documents filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission this week.

The news spells signals more misery ahead for workers at the struggling telecoms and network equipment firm, who have seen their numbers dwindle from 95,000 down to around 36,000 at the end of Q2 2003. Nortel has been forced to cut its workforce by two-thirds and restructure its business because of the slump in telecoms equipment sales that has hit the Canadian vendor particularly hard.

A Nortel spokeswoman told Reuters that the charge is to cover its previously announced restructuring which is "substantially completed".

The SEC documents show Nortel's margins remain under pressure. Its gross margin, which stood at 43.7 per cent of sales at the end of Q2 is expected to stay "in the low 40 per cent range for the remainder of 2003".

At the end of July, Nortel reported a net loss of $14 million (Q2 2002: $697 million loss) on declining Q2 sales of $2.33 billion (Q2 2002: $2.77 billion). It took a $5 million restructuring charge for the quarter.

Nortel declined to provide any specific future revenue or earnings guidance in announcing its Q2 results. ®

Related Stories

Nortel in network security product blitz
Nortel leapfrogs Cisco in VoIP sales
Nortel Networks stems red ink
War hits beleaguered networking sector

Free whitepaper – Guidelines for specification of data center power density

Don’t Miss

QualcommQualcomm proffers first smartbook platform

Smartphone spliced with netbook, see

MicrosoftSuppliers fall over themselves to support Exchange 2010

New species spreads to four new environments

Logitech_logo_SMMouse maker spends big on video conferencing

Eeeek... how much?

NetListNetlist goes virtual and dense with server memory

So much for that Cisco UCS memory advantage