Feeds

Sex.com owner can sue VeriSign

For how much?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Gary Kremen, rightful owner of the Sex.com domain name, has won the right to sue the registrar duped into transferring the lucrative domain to a convicted felon, Stephen Cohen.

Judge Alex Kozinski, of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled on Friday that courts should treat domain names exactly as they would "a plot of land" or other types of property. If domain names are property, the three judges sitting in the case ruled, then registrars are responsible for protecting them.

The Appeal Court instructed the US District Court in San Jose to look again at Kremen's lawsuit against VeriSign-subsidiary Network Solutions (NSI). A retrial is expected to begin later this year.

VeriSign acquired NSI after the legal case was filed.

The ruling on Friday is the latest in a string of judgements in the closely watched case, which traces its roots back to NSI's transfer of ownership for Sex.com from Kremen to Cohen 1995. This unauthorised transfer was obtained using forged letters. The case against NSI is that it switched domain name registry records without bothering to check the veracity of these documents.

Plaintiff Gary Kremen and Internet activists have praised the Appeal Court's ruling in the case, which sets an important legal precedent.

"NSI and other domain name registries are a critical part of the architecture that keeps the Internet running," said Electronic Frontier Foundation Staff Attorney Jason Schultz. "The court's Sex.com decision provides Internet domain registrants with protection from inappropriate domain name seizures."

Two years ago Cohen was ordered to pay $65 million in damages to Kremen, however Kremen has seen little of this money. Cohen skipped the US shortly after this ruling. Most of the vast sum of wealth he made off the back of the Sex.com empire he built up remain in hard to trace off shore accounts. ®

External Links

Court documents in sex.com case (from EFF)
Court decision in Sex.com (Kremen v NSI) case

Related Stories

Sex.com, Sex.com, you're my Sex.com
Sex.com conman continues ludicrous legal fight
Is this the end of the domain transfer nightmare?
Sex.com could cost VeriSign $100m, says suit
Manhunt starts for Sex.com snatcher
Sex.com owner wins $65m damages

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.