Feeds

Red Hat to dump retail, devolve package work

So what's the new channel strategy then, people?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Red Hat will abandon retail shrinkwrap software when it releases "Cambridge," its next major upgrade, says Linux and Main, citing "company communications with employees and developers" as sources. The move will be implemented along with changes to the company's distribution and development procedures, according to the site - these are expected to be announced later today, but it is not clear whether the shrinkwrap pullout will be part of the announcement.

The move however is not unexpected. Red Hat earlier this year indicated that it didn't see a long term future in retail boxed product sales, and said it was investigating alternative distribution channels. The Linux 'twice a year' upgrade cycle for the consumer/enthusiast market combined with production lead times for boxware also mean short shelf lives, making it even more difficult to run a viable shrinkwrap business line.

Red Hat will however have to come up with some convincing alternative distribution strategies if it is to avoid this being seen as a pullout - deliberate or inadvertent - from the consumer business, because although retail may not have a significant effect on the bottom line it has value in terms of presence. The nuances of the distribution and development announcements should therefore be watched carefully in order to assess the extent to which they constitute a positive, forward strategy for the Red Hat consumer business, as opposed to mere cost-cutting of a line undergoing de-emphasis.

According to Linux and Main, Red Hat will begin by making the development list public and will be returning package maintenance to the developers themselves, whereas currently Red Hat developers take control of the packages and tune them for inclusion in a particular version.

It's possibly in the way you tell them, but that component of the plan at least looks largely cost-cutting, upsides depending on how Red Hat proposes to play it. It may have positive aspects if it results in applications becoming more generic across distributions.

It's not yet clear how Red Hat proposes to replace the shrinkwrap retail channel, but as we say, it will need to do something positive here if it's to convince people it remains serious about the market. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Business is back, baby! Hasta la VISTA, Win 8... Oh, yeah, Windows 9
Forget touchscreen millennials, Microsoft goes for mouse crowd
Microsoft WINDOWS 10: Seven ATE Nine. Or Eight did really
Windows NEIN skipped, tech preview due out on Wednesday
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
Lotus Notes inventor Ozzie invents app to talk to people on your phone
Imagine that. Startup floats with voice collab app for Win iPhone
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.