Feeds

EC drafts m-payments blueprint

Good start

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

The European Commission has recently published, as a discussion document, a draft blueprint for mobile payments, writes John MacGowan of Bloor Research. The purpose is to "accelerate the deployment of mobile payments throughout the Union" and is aimed at consolidating the views and recommendations of the financial institutions and telecoms sectors.

Recent meetings between the major players, from both sectors, have highlighted the differences in their:

  • respective strategies
  • attitude to risk
  • interpretation of the legal position and perceived obstacles
  • ideas on how to charge for mobile services
  • which technical standards to adopt
  • attitudes to security infrastructure.
  • Consensus building at a European level, is therefore seen as a priority, augmented by a proposed "top-down" approach to compliment, what have so far been regarded as, "bottom up" activities.

Strategically, it is fair to say that the blueprint is intended to serve as a means to "accelerate market developments which no organisation or groups of organisations acting alone could have achieved". Other issues critical to the Commission are that having implemented the Single European Currency (the Euro), the Single European Payment Area - part of eEurope 2005 - is "within sight".

The Action Plan (for eEurope 2005) has two relevant objectives, namely:

Interoperability. By end 2003, the private sector should have developed interoperable e-business solutions for transactions, security, procurement and payments; i.e. facilitating mobile commerce.

Reduce barriers to broadband deployment (including 3G Communications). By promoting use of open platforms for access to applications and services; primarily through digital television, 3G mobile technology and platforms available in the future.

The major perceived obstacles, between the aforementioned sectors, are:

Business requirements: Given the sums paid for 3G licenses and the costs to develop new products/services, the network operators need to maximise their ROI. The banks take a more 'laid back' attitude, wanting to avoid the effects of disintermediation and not wanting to open up the market to new [competitive] entrants.

Investment protection: The general uncertainty over the enthusiasm and take-up of 3G services, likely time scales to profitability, etc have led investors to be cautious and to keep "their powder dry".

Business complexity: Current arrangements have raised the point that a choice of mobile service provider should not be dictated by specific marketing alliances/agreements initiated between mobile network operators.

Contract management: To permit new 'mobile communication service providers' to enter the market and to function independently from network operators.

Security approval and certification: The Industry, and involved parties, to establish a security working party to evaluate and adjudicate on these issues.

Distribution channels: Use of open architectures for mobile payments may require specific agreements in the secure distribution of confidential documents, personalised SIM cards, encryption keys, application downloads, etc.

Resolution of the value of mobile payment transactions (macro and maximum), dual slot devices, dual SIM cards that are EMV compliant are all intriguing possibilities mentioned in the draft.

It's a good start, with many a hurdle to overcome, nevertheless the question of being able to make interoperable mobile payments will ultimately effect us all.

© IT-Analysis.com

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Of COURSE Stephen Elop's to blame for Nokia woes, says author
'Google did have some unique propositions for Nokia'
FCC, Google cast eye over millimetre wireless
The smaller the wave, the bigger 5G's chances of success
It's even GRIMMER up North after MEGA SKY BROADBAND OUTAGE
By 'eck! Eccles cake production thrown into jeopardy
Mobile coverage on trains really is pants
You thought it was just *insert your provider here*, but now we have numbers
Don't mess with Texas ('cos it's getting Google Fiber and you're not)
A bit late, but company says 1Gbps Austin network almost ready to compete with AT&T
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.