Feeds

IBM steps over HP to take benchmark lead

What Itanic server?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

IBM and Hewlett-Packard are engaged in one of the fiercest benchmarking battles seen in some time.

As of Monday afternoon, IBM reclaimed the world record for transaction processing with one of its high-end pSeries Unix servers. The system edged out a larger Itanium 2-based server from HP that had held the top score since May 20.

The two server giants just cannot agree on who should be on top. They have been playing a lengthy game of leapfrog that must be putting incredible strain on their engineers.

Keep tweaking, boys and girls. A few more transactions can be pulled out of those servers.

IBM no longer has to rely on Oracle's database to set record scores. For the latest benchmark, it used a 32 processor p690 server equipped with Power4+ chips, DB2 and the IBM TotalStorage FastT900 storage system. IBM managed to crank out 763,898 transactions per minute. HP put up 707, 102 transactions per minute with a 64 processor Itanium 2 server running 64bit Microsoft Windows and SQL Server.

All of this begs the question, "Who cares?".

It's never a good idea to put too much stock in these benchmarks. The vendors spend millions to fine tune their systems and have all kinds of interesting tricks for generating a high mark. Both of these servers appear to perform just fine, so why all the fuss?

For once, a press release provides the answer.

"The notion that HP's Itanium 2 processor-based servers are less expensive than IBM's widely popular Unix eServer systems is a myth," said Adalio Sanchez, general manager of IBM's pSeries systems, in a statement.

This all comes down to a nasty squabble between IBM and HP over who is the biggest, baddest server vendor around. IBM wants to flex its Power4 muscles and make sure users don't question whether the chips can keep up with Itanic. HP wants to prove it has made the right decision by picking Intel's 64bit experiment instead of homegrown chips.

IBM is so desperate to keep Power4 mind share high that it undermined its own Itanium 2 system launch with the benchmark announcement. On the very same day the major vendors unveiled their Itanium 2 (Madison) systems, IBM published the Power4+ score.

IBM appears willing to let this Itanic thing hang around but won't go out of its away to plug the chip. A real respect for Itanic would require holding a Power press release for an entire week. ®

Related Stories

IBM admits Madison exists, beefs up Xeon line
HP greets Madison with Integrity
Madison puts on its floaties but can it swim?
IBM: Power5 four times faster than Power4

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Cutting cancer rates: Data, models and a happy ending?
How surgery might be making cancer prognoses worse
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?