Feeds

IBM steps over HP to take benchmark lead

What Itanic server?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Remote control for virtualized desktops

IBM and Hewlett-Packard are engaged in one of the fiercest benchmarking battles seen in some time.

As of Monday afternoon, IBM reclaimed the world record for transaction processing with one of its high-end pSeries Unix servers. The system edged out a larger Itanium 2-based server from HP that had held the top score since May 20.

The two server giants just cannot agree on who should be on top. They have been playing a lengthy game of leapfrog that must be putting incredible strain on their engineers.

Keep tweaking, boys and girls. A few more transactions can be pulled out of those servers.

IBM no longer has to rely on Oracle's database to set record scores. For the latest benchmark, it used a 32 processor p690 server equipped with Power4+ chips, DB2 and the IBM TotalStorage FastT900 storage system. IBM managed to crank out 763,898 transactions per minute. HP put up 707, 102 transactions per minute with a 64 processor Itanium 2 server running 64bit Microsoft Windows and SQL Server.

All of this begs the question, "Who cares?".

It's never a good idea to put too much stock in these benchmarks. The vendors spend millions to fine tune their systems and have all kinds of interesting tricks for generating a high mark. Both of these servers appear to perform just fine, so why all the fuss?

For once, a press release provides the answer.

"The notion that HP's Itanium 2 processor-based servers are less expensive than IBM's widely popular Unix eServer systems is a myth," said Adalio Sanchez, general manager of IBM's pSeries systems, in a statement.

This all comes down to a nasty squabble between IBM and HP over who is the biggest, baddest server vendor around. IBM wants to flex its Power4 muscles and make sure users don't question whether the chips can keep up with Itanic. HP wants to prove it has made the right decision by picking Intel's 64bit experiment instead of homegrown chips.

IBM is so desperate to keep Power4 mind share high that it undermined its own Itanium 2 system launch with the benchmark announcement. On the very same day the major vendors unveiled their Itanium 2 (Madison) systems, IBM published the Power4+ score.

IBM appears willing to let this Itanic thing hang around but won't go out of its away to plug the chip. A real respect for Itanic would require holding a Power press release for an entire week. ®

Related Stories

IBM admits Madison exists, beefs up Xeon line
HP greets Madison with Integrity
Madison puts on its floaties but can it swim?
IBM: Power5 four times faster than Power4

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
NSA SOURCE CODE LEAK: Information slurp tools to appear online
Now you can run your own intelligence agency
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
Stop the IoT revolution! We need to figure out packet sizes first
Researchers test 802.15.4 and find we know nuh-think! about large scale sensor network ops
Turnbull should spare us all airline-magazine-grade cloud hype
Box-hugger is not a dirty word, Minister. Box-huggers make the cloud WORK
SanDisk vows: We'll have a 16TB SSD WHOPPER by 2016
Flash WORM has a serious use for archived photos and videos
Astro-boffins start opening universe simulation data
Got a supercomputer? Want to simulate a universe? Here you go
Microsoft adds video offering to Office 365. Oh NOES, you'll need Adobe Flash
Lovely presentations... but not on your Flash-hating mobe
prev story

Whitepapers

Free virtual appliance for wire data analytics
The ExtraHop Discovery Edition is a free virtual appliance will help you to discover the performance of your applications across the network, web, VDI, database, and storage tiers.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Website security in corporate America
Find out how you rank among other IT managers testing your website's vulnerabilities.