Feeds

Joe Public blames banks for credit card fraud

Will chip and PIN bolster public confidence?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

Over half of all consumers (54%) feel that banks and building societies aren't doing enough to protect them from credit and debit card fraud, according to the results of a survey published today.

Although the survey (conducted last month) didn't quiz members of the public on the Chip and PIN programme, a serious omission in our view, it still provides some insight into public perceptions about credit card fraud.

The chip and PIN system is designed to guard against credit card fraud by requiring customers to tap in a four digit number - rather than signing a payment slip - when paying for their goods. The system is currently on trial in Northampton but will be nationwide by 2005, as credit cards wiith embedded smart cards are issued throughout the UK.

Depending on your point of view, this is either a great leap forward in the fight against fraud or a scheme that will shift the burden of proving fraud has taken place onto consumers while moving criminal scams from the high street onto the Internet.

But we digress.

According to today's survey of UK adults into attitudes towards credit card fraud, Joe Public blames banks - not law enforcement agencies - for a failure to prevent fraud. Card fraud is one of the fastest growing crimes in the UK. A record £424.6 million of fraud was committed on UK cards in 2002, up from £411.5 million in 2001, according to UK trade association the Association for Payment Clearing Services (APACS).

Only seven per cent of the 1,000 respondents to the survey, commissioned by data mining firm SPSS and conducted by market research outfit ICM, have ever been victims of ATM/credit card fraud.

Only 16 per cent of those questioned said that they thought the police have chief responsibility for preventing fraud. And just one in 50 (two per cent) of those quizzed said retailers had to take charge of combating credit card fraud.

The main responsibility for preventing fraud was placed on the shoulders of card issuers i.e. banks and building societies.

Meanwhile only a quarter of respondents (28 per cent) to the study feel enough is being done to identify and deal with fraud in general.

The study was conducted in May, a month after the start of the chip and PIN programme. The effect of the programme on public attitudes to fraud prevention will be an interesting point for subsequent studies.

Shame SPSS didn't think to ask about it though.

SPSS' research is part of the company's ongoing campaign to identify consumer perceptions to fraud, understand the most common security breaches, and help businesses combat the phenomenon. ®

Related Stories

Credit card firms 'profit from Net fraud'
Small.biz needs help with chip and PIN
Smart credit on UK cards. Will it cut fraud?
Schoolgirl turns tables on email credit card fraudster
E-fraud costs retailers millions

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Obama allows NSA to exploit 0-days: report
If the spooks say they need it, they get it
Web data BLEEDOUT: Users to feel the pain as Heartbleed bug revealed
Vendors and ISPs have work to do updating firmware - if it's possible to fix this
OpenSSL Heartbleed: Bloody nose for open-source bleeding hearts
Bloke behind the cockup says not enough people are helping crucial crypto project
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Call of Duty 'fragged using OpenSSL's Heartbleed exploit'
So it begins ... or maybe not, says one analyst
Heartbleed exploit, inoculation, both released
File under 'this is going to hurt you more than it hurts me'
Bad PUPPY: Undead Windows XP deposits fresh scamware on lawn
Installing random interwebs shiz will bork your zombie box
Experian subsidiary faces MEGA-PROBE for 'selling consumer data to fraudster'
US attorneys general roll up sleeves, snap on gloves
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.