Feeds

Corel shareholders rebel

Just say 'no' to takeover

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

Corel Corporation shareholders are revolting. They say the struggling software company has sold them down the river by agreeing to flog the business for a bargain basement price.

Rebel shareholders have set up a Web site, corelrescue.com, to help railroad this "unfair takeover offer".

Earlier this month, directors of Corel - known for a number of software packages including WordPerfect Office, the CorelDraw Suite and Corel Painter - announced they had accepted a takeover bid by San Francisco-based venture capital firm, Vector Capital.

At the time James Baillie, Corel chairman, said the deal was an "opportunity for the shareholders of Corel to realise the value of their shareholdings" and the takeover was in the "best interests of the company and its shareholders".

The rebel shareholders don't see it this way. They're fuming because the deal values their shares at an "unacceptably low price of just $1.05 per share" (US$97.6m in cash).

In a statement rebels said: "This offer by the Vector Capital…is far too low to be seriously considered. Under the presented scheme, Corel's great line-up of award-winning products…would be virtually given away for free."

They claim the company has "very large cash reserves" and following a recent round of redundancies and other restructuring now has spending under control.

"We shareholders would rather not sell at the bottom of the currently depressed market, but instead want to be able to reap the benefits as we patiently wait for Corel's three-year turnaround plan to fully unfold over the next year or two," they said.

"We appeal to Corel's management and the board of directors, who are hired to look after shareholders' best interests, to scrap this extremely unfair takeover offer and to continue working together with the shareholders towards renewed profitability and the release of Corel's upcoming new enterprise products."

The proposed takeover still needs to be given the green light by the courts and shareholders. ®

Related Story

Corel cuts staff in bid for profitability

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Facebook, Google and Instagram 'worse than drugs' says Miley Cyrus
Italian boffins agree with popette's theory that haters are the real wrecking balls
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
Facebook to let stalkers unearth buried posts with mobe search
Prepare to HAUNT your pal's back catalogue
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.