Feeds

The Bastard Interviewer from Hell

Above board and politically correct

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

Episode 4

BOFH 2003: Episode 4

BOFH logo
There's nothing like a Job Interviewing for a little bit of time off work, and with our current lack of both Head of IT (serious burns after a nasty transformer explosion) and Boss (voted out of the building by a mass of public opinion expressed on an intranet website) the tide appears to be out in the catchment pool of potential interviewers.

Which is where The PFY and I come in...

"As you probably know," The HR Droid burbles to the 12 or so interviewer hopefuls collected in the IT meeting room, "we need to appoint a Selection Committee for the roles of Head of IT Department and Techical Manager, IT Department. For the senior role we expect to shortlist five candidates, whilst for middle management somewhere in the region of the candidates - which means that the interview process is likely to be a whole day for the Head of IT, and half a day for the Technical Manager. The second interview process is likely to only take an hour apiece for both roles. Anyone who would like to be on the Selection Panel would therefore have to be able to make themselves available for those interview times."

At this, a couple of selection team hopefuls get up and reluctantly drag themselves from the room.

"The committee is expected to be myself, two of you people, and the Chief Operating Officer. Are there any other questions before we move on?"

"Is lunch provided?" some furry toothed developer asks, taking a break from picking the egg stains out of his cardigan.

"Uh.. No"

Another couple of people depart...

"Can you be on the committee if you're an applicant?" a sad geek from the helpdesk (with delusions of grandeur) asks.

"Interviewers are expected to be impartial."

And then there were seven...

"In the event that the person chosen turns out to be deadwood, are there any repercussions on members of the committee?" I ask, knowingly.

"Repercussions?"

"You know, undocumented bulletproof-glasss-ceiling, legal action by the company for negligence in the course of the interviewing...."

"You mean would the Company hold you responsible? Of course not!"

Two more chairs are vacated by people who realise just how easily your office can be relocated to outside a toilet door or how quickly a redundancy clause can be invoked.

"No more questions. In that case I suppose we should just select from you five. What do you say, draw names out of a hat?"

"What about Rock, Paper Scissors?" The PFY suggests.

Ten minutes later..

"Funny." the HR Droid mumbles to The PFY and I as the sole survivors of the game. "We only had Paper, Rock and Scissors - Claw Hammer wasn't an option."

"Big Boy's games, Big Boy's rules," The PFY comments, putting the aforementioned item back in his backpack.

"Well, I suppose in the absence of objection I'll just get my assistant, Sharon, to go over what we're expecting from you in interview techniques. Sharon?"

"Hi," Sharon says, addressing The PFY and me. "What I'm basically going to cover is Interview Technique, what you should be looking for, questions you should be asking, the manner in which you ask them, and questions that are not acceptable in an interview situation."

I was worried about this - Talk about take all the fun out of interviewing....

"Not acceptable?"

"Yes, questions which might be used in a discriminatory evaluation - Race, Creed and of course, Sex.."

"Uh, not for me thanks!" The PFY slips in cheerfully.

"That is exactly what I'm talking about," she snaps.

"Yes, but I'm just not interested," The PFY responds, switching levity off with a >snap<</p>

"Look, I'm serious!"

"I'm sure you are, but I'm just not available - I'm already in a relationship!"

"Right! I'm sorry," Sharon chirps decisively, putting a line through The PFY's name on her interviewer sheet, "but I don't think that you're suitable material for an interviewee."

"I can't believe it!" The PFY cries "I'm being kicked off the interview panel because I won't sleep with her!"

"That's just shameful!" I concur, seeing the bandwagon and jumping on board to see where the ride takes us. "Isn't this against company policy - Harassment or something?!!"

"I THINK Sharon was trying to highlight questions that would be unsuitable for an interview and your partner grasped the wrong end of the stick" The HR Droid replies soothingly.

"GOOD GRIEF MAN, HE'S NOT MY PARTNER!" I gasp, overplaying the horror a little, "JUST BECAUSE HE WON'T SLEEP WITH HER DOESN'T MEAN HE'S GAY!? AND QUITE FRANKLY, *I* RESENT THE IMPLICATION!!!"

"No-one was implying anything by this!" The HR Droid babbles attempting to calm things down before they really get out of hand. "I meant partner at work."

"What, you're suggesting we're ambidextrous!" The PFY cries ."AC at home and DC at work!!!!"

"NO! No-one's suggesting anything of the sort! LOOK, what we mean is that there are certain phrases, topics and questions which aren't appropriate in the process of an interview, and they should be avoided."

"Oh!" The PFY gushes, "Now I understand! But which phrases precisely? The problem with the Internet is that it's a multicultural group with varying degrees of what's acceptable and not. Could you give me some, well, examples of what we shouldn't say, questions we shouldn't ask - words we shouldn't use."

. . . .

Fish, Barrel, Loud Bangs...
. . . .

"Well it's fairly damning evidence, I have to agree!" the Head of HR nods sadly as The PFY plays back the recording of selected parts of our conversation from his PDA. "And obviously, I'm pleased you brought it to me to deal with, and didn't complain at other levels. You realise, however, that this complaint will slow the interview process down significantly."

"We understand," I respond, "but we'd rather do this the proper way if possible…"

"Yes," The PFY concurs. "Everything above board and Politically Correct..." ®

BOFH is copyright © 1995-2003, Simon Travaglia. Don't mess with his rights

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Seagate brings out 6TB HDD, did not need NO STEENKIN' SHINGLES
Or helium filling either, according to reports
European Court of Justice rips up Data Retention Directive
Rules 'interfering' measure to be 'invalid'
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Cisco reps flog Whiptail's Invicta arrays against EMC and Pure
Storage reseller report reveals who's selling what
Bored with trading oil and gold? Why not flog some CLOUD servers?
Chicago Mercantile Exchange plans cloud spot exchange
Just what could be inside Dropbox's new 'Home For Life'?
Biz apps, messaging, photos, email, more storage – sorry, did you think there would be cake?
IT bods: How long does it take YOU to train up on new tech?
I'll leave my arrays to do the hard work, if you don't mind
Amazon reveals its Google-killing 'R3' server instances
A mega-memory instance that never forgets
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.