Feeds

Gartner's look at Alternatives to Microsoft

Discipline required

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

An increasing number of companies and governments are looking at non-Microsoft options, with Linux the number one threat, Gartner says.

The research firm on Tuesday combined ten separate notes into a report entitled "A Look at Alternatives to Microsoft." Among other things, it concludes that Linux and other open source software are the most popular alternatives to Microsoft software.

According to Gartner, the lure lies in the lower, and sometimes free, initial costs; the perceived freedom from lock-in with a single vendor; and the potential to help drive local IT economies. The perception of better security also drives the use of alternatives, Gartner said.

Breaking down its research by region, Gartner says that governments in Asia/Pacific, as well as in several European and South American counties, go for Linux and other open source software options because they believe it will help spur local IT industry. Such governments also tend to encourage companies to use open source alternatives to Microsoft, Gartner said.

"These countries believe they can spark their local IT industries and thus avoid having to export increasing amounts of their gross domestic product to US-based companies," said David Smith, vice president and Gartner fellow.

Fear surrounding the dominance of Microsoft is less prevalent in North America, the report said, but in that region software rivals and hardware makers are putting up a tough fight with the Redmond-based giant to push back, stop or a least slow its influence.

"Worldwide sentiment surrounding attitudes regarding Microsoft vary widely, especially by geography," said Robin Simpson, research director for Gartner. "Governments and businesses, especially outside the United States, are increasingly interested in pursuing strategies that insulate them from Microsoft's growing influence on the IT industry, even if alternate solutions aren't exactly a perfect fit."

Indeed, Gartner's Smith said that there are risks associated with the non-Microsoft route, including a need for companies to install new processes in the overall development, deployment, maintenance and support of their IT infrastructures. He added that a "disciplined and carefully considered best-practice process" is necessary to get good returns from using Linux and other open source tools and programmes. "Without it, the investments could lead to higher, unanticipated costs."

© ENN

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
BBC: We're going to slip CODING into kids' TV
Pureed-carrot-in-ice cream C++ surprise
China: You, Microsoft. Office-Windows 'compatibility'. You have 20 days to explain
Told to cough up more details as antitrust probe goes deeper
Linux turns 23 and Linus Torvalds celebrates as only he can
No, not with swearing, but by controlling the release cycle
Scratched PC-dispatch patch patched, hatched in batch rematch
Windows security update fixed after triggering blue screens (and screams) of death
This is how I set about making a fortune with my own startup
Would you leave your well-paid job to chase your dream?
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.