Feeds

Siebel customers are satisfied. True

Survey nicer than internal docs

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Siebel's release of new survey data comes shortly after the revelation that it is calling in the authorities to investigate the leaking of confidential documents questioning customer satisfaction. The company is particularly sensitive to such criticisms at the moment, as it struggles to turn around its falling sales revenue.

Siebel cited a large-scale Siebel customer survey carried out by Aberdeen Group, which indicated that the majority of businesses utilizing Siebel CRM products have gained demonstrable benefits and achieved notable investment returns.

Aberdeen surveyed more than 1,400 customers, receiving what it said is a statistically valid 535 responses. The stress on the statistical validity is an oblique reference to a customer satisfaction survey carried out on a small sample of Siebel's customers by Nucleus Research, which criticized the ROI but was based on a statistically insignificant number of responses.

According to Aberdeen, more than 95% of respondents were satisfied with their CRM investment and will continue to use Siebel solutions. Customers confirmed they were able to estimate specific benefits and reported that, on average, sales productivity increased 17%, service and call center productivity increased 16%, and marketing productivity increased 12%. Operating costs declined by more than 10% for 87% of the customers surveyed.

One statistic that Siebel must have found particularly welcome was the 73% of respondents who said they would add to or upgrade their CRM system in the next 12 months. Especially as last week the company announced a 92% plunge in net income to $4.6 million for Q1 2003, on revenue that dropped 30% to $332.8 million.

While some of this is due to external economic and geo-political factors, Siebel is also having to wrestle with internal changes. These changes stretch from the new architecture behind Siebel 7 and associated customer upgrade issues, to the operational requirements needed to switch from a business based on a relatively small number of mega-sales per quarter, to a larger number of smaller sales. While Siebel is always sensitive to accusations of customer dissatisfaction, the company is particularly conscious of them at the moment, as it makes the necessary changes to get itself back on track.

© datamonitor logo

Datamonitor is offering Reg readers some of its technology research FOC. Check it out here.

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Linux? Bah! Red Hat has its eye on the CLOUD – and it wants to own it
CEO says it will be 'undisputed leader' in enterprise cloud tech
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
Troll hunter Rackspace turns Rotatable's bizarro patent to stone
News of the Weird: Screen-rotating technology declared unpatentable
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.