Feeds

SAP results outperform rivals

Can it be sustained?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

In the light of recent warnings by PeopleSoft and Siebel Systems, there were a few sighs of relief when SAP AG released its preliminary Q1 results, because although they represented a mixed bag, they were considered to be strong when compared to those of SAP's peers. However, its ability to outperform the market looks less secure in the long-term.

Even though SAP has a strong position relative to PeopleSoft, Siebel and Oracle, the inevitable question about the sustainability of that position remains.

To maintain its position in the market, SAP needs to continue to win new customers while also making incremental sales to its existing customer base, hence a heavy emphasis on CRM, SCM, portals, the integration capabilities of the NetWeaver platform, and unsubtle encouragement on the upgrade front. Although it is winning new customers, and CRM and SCM sales in particular are going well, there are areas of concern regarding the take-up of some of the newer technologies.

The percentage of revenue gained through sales of SAP's core finance and HR applications is dropping, from 43% in Q1 2002 to 33% in the Q1 2003. Although they produce a healthy, predictable and nicely visible income stream, they are not growth areas so SAP needs customers to take up its newer technology, yet the existing customer base appears to be reluctant.

A recent survey carried out by ComputerWire indicates that planned take-up of xApps and NetWeaver is low. The survey found 88% of companies said they are not interested in xApps. Just 1.3% are currently considering the process-centric cross applications, a mere 8% are planning to procure them in 2003, dropping back to 1.3% who are looking at purchasing xApps in 2004 and beyond. The picture is similar in relation to NetWeaver, with 85% uninterested, 8% considering it now, 2.7% planning procurement during 2003 and the same again for 2004 and beyond.

SAP's position is not in danger but the company no longer looks quite so unassailable in comparative terms. Even though it has managed to outperform the market, the question of how long it can continue to do so, to the extent it has achieved to date, is edging higher up the agenda.

© datamonitor logo

Datamonitor is offering Reg readers some of its technology research FOC. Check it out here.

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Wanna keep your data for 1,000 YEARS? No? Hard luck, HDS wants you to anyway
Combine Blu-ray and M-DISC and you get this monster
US boffins demo 'twisted radio' mux
OAM takes wireless signals to 32 Gbps
Apple flops out 2FA for iCloud in bid to stop future nude selfie leaks
Millions of 4chan users howl with laughter as Cupertino slams stable door
No biggie: EMC's XtremIO firmware upgrade 'will wipe data'
But it'll have no impact and will be seamless, we're told
Students playing with impressive racks? Yes, it's cluster comp time
The most comprehensive coverage the world has ever seen. Ever
Run little spreadsheet, run! IBM's Watson is coming to gobble you up
Big Blue's big super's big appetite for big data in big clouds for big analytics
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.