Feeds

Application Vulnerability Description Language coined

Verily security scanners shall talk unto remediation tools

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Security vendors joined together today to back a standard for describing application security vulnerabilities.

The new Application Vulnerability Description Language (AVDL), to be managed through the OASIS consortium, provides a "XML standard to define, categorize and classify application vulnerabilities in a standardized fashion".

The language provides a way for vulnerability scanners, for example, to exchange data with application security software. OASIS has established a Technical Committee to develop the standard.

The laudable aim of the standard is to reduce security management headaches, but we have our doubts if will it work?

First, the security industry is notoriously fragmented. Unlike other market segments, there are scores of vendors selling competitive and incompatible products. Standards are very much the exception rather than the norm.

Take the incompatibilities that plagued the public-key infrastructure market, the stateful inspection versus packet filtering approaches to firewalls or the more current intrusion protection versus intrusion detection debate. On the other hand we're starting to see some sort of consensus (based on 802.1X) on an approach to wireless LAN security, but not comes from equipment vendors more than security firms.

Secondly the list of names (Citadel Security Software, GuardedNet, NetContinuum, SPI Dynamics and Teros) so far signed up for AVDL lacks the real heavy hitters. Cisco, Network Associates, ISS and Symantec don't feature.

IBM, Computer Associates and HP, which make good money selling tools that enable enterprises to manage their security infrastructure, aren't signed up either. AVDL may make it easier to manage and deploy best in breed products. But are security suite evangelists, like IBM and HP, going to be keen on this approach?

Lastly we need to consider the anti-virus tools market, where vendors can't even agree names for viruses much less anything else. For years end users have looked to consistency in naming, vendors always say that's a good idea - then do nothing.

The first meeting of the full OASIS Technical Committee for AVDL has been scheduled for May 15. The first candidate AVDL specification will be posted for comment during Q3'03, with final spec due before the end of the year. Additional information on AVDL is available here. ®

Related stories

Oasis ratifies SAML 1.0
RSA removes patent block to SAML uptake
Liberty Alliance proposes Web security standards

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
'Regin': The 'New Stuxnet' spook-grade SOFTWARE WEAPON described
'A degree of technical competence rarely seen'
You really need to do some tech support for Aunty Agnes
Free anti-virus software, expires, stops updating and p0wns the world
Regin: The super-spyware the security industry has been silent about
NSA fingered as likely source of complex malware family
You stupid BRICK! PCs running Avast AV can't handle Windows fixes
Fix issued, fingers pointed, forums in flames
Privacy bods offer GOV SPY VICTIMS a FREE SPYWARE SNIFFER
Looks for gov malware that evades most antivirus
Patch NOW! Microsoft slings emergency bug fix at Windows admins
Vulnerability promotes lusers to domain overlords ... oops
HACKERS can DELETE SURVEILLANCE DVRS remotely – report
Hikvision devices wide open to hacking, claim securobods
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Go beyond APM with real-time IT operations analytics
How IT operations teams can harness the wealth of wire data already flowing through their environment for real-time operational intelligence.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?