Feeds

Tanglewood: the next Itanium revealed

Runs cool with cores aplenty

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Exclusive Intel appears to be moving in the direction of rivals Sun and IBM with a future version of the Itanium processor code-named Tanglewood, according to documents seen by The Register.

Tanglewood will mark Intel's most serious foray yet into the world of multicore processors. It will follow the dual core Montecito Itanium that arrives in 2005 and have even more cores per die and low power characteristics, sources confirm.

The chip is a significant departure from its beastly predecessors, including Madison and the low power Deerfield that arrive this year. Instead, Tanglewood resembles the dual core UltraSPARC IV due out from Sun this year or IBM's Power5 chip coming in 2004. All three companies are trying to keep a close eye on power consumption and hoping to take advantage of multicore chips than resemble mini-SMPs.

Intel, however, has a long way to go before customers see it as a power friendly chip supplier. At 130 watts, current Itanics push the limits for what you would want to squeeze safely into a server. By contrast, Sun and IBM have tried to keep their chips cool, saying they take the whole system design into account, and Intel doesn't do systems.

Perhaps, the old Alpha team had a hand in changing Intel's ways. Our documents show that several former Alpha engineers were working on technology for Tanglewood while still at Compaq. Their suggestions for some fault tolerant aspects to Tanglewood appear to have caught the eye of their current bosses at Intel.

Coincidentally, both Intel and Compaq have offices near the scenic Tanglewood area back East in Massachusetts.

If Tanglewood appears in 2006 or 2007, it will likely play a major role in Itanic's success or failure with that being the time period pegged by analysts for Itanic to make its move. But by that time, Sun and IBM will both have chips loaded with many processor cores, so its hard to say exactly how Intel will stack up.

HP will also be relying on Tanglewood-powered servers to please old PA-RISC and Alpha customers forced to move onto Itanic. With both PA-RISC and Alpha on their last legs, 2006 should be a prime time to upgrade kit.

An Intel spokeswoman declined to "comment on speculation about future products that may or may not be in development." ®

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
Sysadmin Day 2014: Quick, there's still time to get the beers in
He walked over the broken glass, killed the thugs... and er... reconnected the cables*
Auntie remains MYSTIFIED by that weekend BBC iPlayer and website outage
Still doing 'forensics' on the caching layer – Beeb digi wonk
Microsoft says 'weird things' can happen during Windows Server 2003 migrations
Fix coming for bug that makes Kerberos croak when you run two domain controllers
Cisco says network virtualisation won't pay off everywhere
Another sign of strain in the Borg/VMware relationship?
VVOL update: Are any vendors NOT leaping into bed with VMware?
It's not yet been released but everyone thinks it's the dog's danglies
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Backing up Big Data
Solving backup challenges and “protect everything from everywhere,” as we move into the era of big data management and the adoption of BYOD.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.