Feeds

LSD puts Sendmail bug under the microscope

Proof of concept

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Polish ethical hackers Last Stage of Delirium (LSD) yesterday published proof of concept code for a serious flaw in Sendmail which emerged this week.

In a posting to BugTraq yesterday, LSD provides a detailed analysis of the buffer overflow vulnerability for the first time.

Previous advisories on the flaw, which has been present in Sendmail (undiscovered) for some years, are noticeably lacking in detail.

The vulnerability resides within the crackaddr(char* addr) function of the headers.c file, according to LSD's research. Ironically this function is designed to be a security mechanism.

Based on their preliminary work the Poles tentatively suggest the Sendmail vulnerability is less bad than
it first appeared.

"Due to the nature of the discussed Sendmail vulnerability it seems that it is unexploitable on most of commercially available UNIX systems," LSD writes. "It also doesn't seem to be exploitable on most of the default SMTP installations of x86 based open-source systems.

"This leads to the conclusion that the overall impact of the vulnerability is rather limited and not so significant as it might be thought," the group adds.

By its own admission, LSD's analysis is not exhaustive, testing only for one possible exploit mechanism on Unix and (Slackwave and Red Hat) Linux servers. So don't read too much into the group's conclusions just yet.

"We cannot exclude that there does not exist another execution path in the Sendmail code, that could lead to the program counter overwrite," LSD writes.

In a follow-up post, Sendmail's Eric Allman points out patches still need to be applied.

"Please don't breath a sigh of relief because you are running on one of the 'does not crash' systems," he writes.

"Besides direct execution path exploits, there are other variables that are not pointers that have security implications; finding one of them within range will be more difficult, but probably not impossible." ®

Related Stories

Sendmail vuln. Patch now
Slammer: Why security benefits from proof of concept code
Open and closed security are roughly equivalent
FBI names 20 most unwanted security flaws

External Links

CERT advisory: Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail
Patch application and testing tool from Sendmail

New hybrid storage solutions

More from The Register

next story
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Google recommends pronounceable passwords
Super Chrome goes into battle with Mr Mxyzptlk
Infosec geniuses hack a Canon PRINTER and install DOOM
Internet of Stuff securo-cockups strike yet again
THREE QUARTERS of Android mobes open to web page spy bug
Metasploit module gobbles KitKat SOP slop
'Speargun' program is fantasy, says cable operator
We just might notice if you cut our cables
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
Snowden, Dotcom, throw bombs into NZ election campaign
Claim of tapped undersea cable refuted by Kiwi PM as Kim claims extradition plot
YouTube, Amazon and Yahoo! caught in malvertising mess
Cisco says 'Kyle and Stan' attack is spreading through compromised ad networks
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.