Feeds

Poker.com Inc continues fight over ‘hijacked’ URL

UDRP arbitrator dismisses case

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Update Poker.com Inc is continuing to pursue "all legal avenues" in a bid to regain control of the domain www.poker.com.

In December, the Canada-based company claimed it had been the victim of a "form of technological piracy" after it alleged that the poker.com domain was "hijacked and re-directed without the consent or knowledge of the company".

In a new statement Poker.com Inc. (and not Poker.com as we wrote in a previous version of this article. That's the other side. Apologies for any confusion created by our own confusion) said that a recent ICANN ruling refused to acknowledge that Communication Services Inc (the current registrant of the domain) were using the URL illegally and have suggested that action was more appropriate to be commenced against ALA Corp (the previous registrant of the domain).

Actually, the arbitrator went a great deal further than that, noting that it "is difficult to see how Complainant UniNet (an affiliate of Poker.com Inc which teamed up in the ICANN arbitration) has or ever had any interest in the trademarks at issue".

Following the ruling, Judith Silver, a trademark lawyer acting on behalf of Communication Services Inc., accused Poker.com Inc and Uninet of attempting to "litigate a contract dispute with a party other than the domain registrant using the ICANN system."

Now for a quote from Malcolm Nickerson, director of Communications Services Inc. "This entire matter stems from a dispute between UniNet Inc. and Ala Corporation and has nothing whatsoever to do with Communications Services Inc. In my opinion, this complaint was an unwarranted abuse of the ICANN system".

According to Nickerson, the dispute between UniNet Inc. and Ala Corporation stems from an "allegation by UniNet Technologies that it has valid right to use the
domain name www.poker.com arising from an alleged license agreement with Ala Corporation".

Got that? You can read the ruling, CPR Case 00301, in full at CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution . ®

Related Story

Hijacked? Fight over Poker.com URL

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.