Sex.com could cost VeriSign $100m, says suit
One of life's bigger bloopers?
Posted in Music and Media, 20th January 2003 12:57 GMT
Increase your knowledge of the latest threats to your busines
The company said in a statement Thursday that an appeals court in San Francisco has asked the California Supreme Court to rule on whether a domain name can be classed as property and for guidance on other matters.
A court last year found that conman Stephen Cohen used a forged letter to trick Network Solutions Inc, now owned by VeriSign, into transferring ownership of the valuable domain from Gary Kremen, now CEO of the portal, in 1994.
Cohen, who made millions from the domain, was ordered to give back the domain and pay $65m damages, but subsequently went AWOL and has not come forward with the cash. Kremen and his attorneys seek to extract damages from VeriSign for allowing the fraud to take place.
Sex.com is looking for damages that could amount to $100m. VeriSign claims that domain names, which are typically registered to companies and individuals for annual fees, rather than sold outright, cannot be classed as property and that the company cannot be held liable for what Kremen calls a "negligent transfer".
© ComputerWire
Increase your knowledge of the latest threats to your busines


The future of SaaS and IT infrastructure management
The Total Economic Impact of Dell's PC products and services
The best practices guide for application security
Reducing messaging and web security costs with managed services

Win a Samsung C6625!
Is your cameraphone an oxymoron?
Reg Mobile and Wireless newsletter is go! go! go!
Sign up, sign up for The Register IT security newsletter