Feeds

AT&T chops 3,500 staff, turns to Covad for DSL

Management bears brunt for once

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

New hybrid storage solutions

ComputerWire logo AT&T Corp plans to lay off 3,500 staff, just under 5% of its workforce, in a move that will lead to a $240m restructuring charge in its fourth quarter. More than half the job cuts are in management, and AT&T said the move is the result of "improved processes and automation" in the provisioning and maintenance of services for business customers.

It will be no surprise if the managers shown the door include those responsible for guiding its past DSL strategy, whose failure has led AT&T to switch much of its DSL traffic to the network of Santa Clara, California-based Covad Communications Group Inc.

Job cuts have become an annual ritual at AT&T, and the latest round is mild compared with the 10,000 reduction announced a year ago that led to a $1bn charge. But with revenue on the slide, ferocious competition and slim-line margins, especially in the market for business customers, this is unlikely to be the last time that the Bedminster, New Jersey-based company reduces a payroll that currently stands at 72,000.

AT&T's fourth-quarter figures are unlikely to make happy reading for investors as the company has already announced that it will take a $1.1bn asset impairment charge related to its investment in AT&T Latin America. On top of this, it will take a $200m impairment charge against its own DSL assets after agreeing the deal with Covad. Previously AT&T had based its DSL strategy on its March 2001 acquisition of defunct DSL operator NorthPoint Communications Inc for $135m.

At the time a company official said it would use the network for multiple services including local and long-distance voice and "things we haven't even begun to think about yet."

AT&T now says it will offer services using Covad's nationwide network, which passed 40 million US homes and businesses. The company already has a deal to offer DSL services to business customers using Covad's network.

AT&T said it will still offer DSL services over its own facilities in several areas of New York, Texas and California. Under the terms of the deal, Covad has given AT&T the option of buying 3 million of its shares, or 1.3% of the total.

© ComputerWire

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
'Serious flaws in the Vertigan report' says broadband boffin
Report 'fails reality test' , is 'simply wrong' and offers ''convenient' justification for FTTN says Rod Tucker
This flashlight app requires: Your contacts list, identity, access to your camera...
Who us, dodgy? Vast majority of mobile apps fail privacy test
Apple Watch will CONQUER smartwatch world – analysts
After Applelocalypse, other wristputers will get stuck in
Shades of Mannesmann: Vodafone should buy T-Mobile US
Biting the bullet would let Blighty-based biz flip the bird at AT&T
Drag queens: Oh, don't be so bitchy, Facebook! Let us use our stage names
Handbags at dawn over free content ad network's ID policy
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.