Feeds

HP comes clean in latest wave of storage benchmarks

Testing Times

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

The Storage Performance Council has posted another wave of benchmarks, including new results for hardware from IBM Corp and 3Pardata Inc, and a re-test by Hewlett Packard Co in response to criticism of what was diplomatically called the "real world applicability"of its previous results.

While HP set an example for others - namely LSI Corp - to follow by coming clean over a configuration issue, IBM applied the SPC-1 benchmark to the latest version of its Shark ESS storage array, and start-up 3Pardata Inc tested an entry-level configuration of its storage device.

SPC-1 is designed to measure throughput in a simulated OLTP environment. HP's engineers took the company's Enterprise Virtual Array back into the laboratory to re-test it because the first benchmark was completed with write cache mirroring switched off. This is a feature which slows down performance by a fair margin, but which most customers leave switched on to provide improved data protection.

In the first test, when write cache mirroring was switched off, the EVA scored an SPC-1 IOPS figure of 24,005. In the second test when it was switched on, that IOPS number dropped by 16% to just 20,096. The EVA's average response time when handling 10% of the SPC's full benchmark load also slipped, slowing from 2.29ms to 2.36ms.

David Scott, CEO of 3Par, was among those that criticized the first set of HP results as being less than representative. Yesterday he said: "It's admirable of HP to put these new results on the table. Now, the pressure is going to be on LSI to do the same," he said. LSI switched off write cache mirroring when it tested its FastT arrays earlier this year.

Write cache mirroring involves writing of data to two rather than one solid-state caches within a storage array. Without it, data is exposed to a single point of failure. The SPC allows it to be switched off during a benchmark test because it is a supported configuration which customers are not discouraged from using. LSI, which estimates that at least 25% of its customers switch it off in order to improve performance, said yesterday that it has not decided yet whether or not to follow HP's lead.

IBM's test of its latest model 800 version of the Shark ESS returned an SPC-1 IOPS figure of 22,999, up heavily on the 8,009 IOPs recorded for the smaller and much cheaper Shark F20 tested earlier in the year.

Privately-held 3Par tested a medium-sized configuration of its InServ S800 storage server in order to demonstrate what it said is the unmatched scalability of its storage array. In the first test of an eight-controller version of the S800 earlier this year, 3Par scored an SPC-1 IOPS figure of 47,001. In the company' latest test, a smaller two-controller version of the same machine scored an IOPS figure of 12,906. The purpose of the second test was to map out a lower end for what 3Par claims is a massive performance and capacity range that can be provided by just one device undergoing non-disruptive upgrades.

© ComputerWire

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
NASA launches new climate model at SC14
75 days of supercomputing later ...
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
DEATH by COMMENTS: WordPress XSS vuln is BIGGEST for YEARS
Trio of XSS turns attackers into admins
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Astro-boffins start opening universe simulation data
Got a supercomputer? Want to simulate a universe? Here you go
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.