Bogdanov brothers deny bogosity

And we believe 'em - but only in even-numbered universes

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Letters Igor Bogdanov has written to us denying the papers published by him and his brother form part of an elaborate hoax. It's a long email citing already-published emails; and we only reproduce these in part.

Re: Physics hoaxers discover Quantum Bogosity

Dear Dr Orlowski,

We were quite surprised to read your conclusions about the "hoax" deliberatly perpetrated by us. This not reflecting the truth. Here is the text we sent to various physicists about this affair :

As everybody probably knows by now, since Oct. 22 we received many emails coming from the whole planet about a rumor of "hoax" based on reverse "Sokal's model".

We were very astonished, my brother and myself, to discover that there is a powerful stream of opinions whose action is to present our works as a deliberate hoax or mystification.

It is pure non sense.

Initiated from France, this campain coincides with the creation of our new scientific TV program on France 2 and could be originated by a very ancient editorial conflict that had nothing to do with science.

We have now identified the main source of this hoax rumor and we send you here after the disclaimer of his author.

Igor Bogdanov

Igor attaches the correspondence from Max Niedermermaier to Ted Newman (referred to here by John Baez in his summary of the case.

They also attach an email detailing the referees reports and the acceptance of the paper published in Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Subject: CQG/119461/PAP
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:19:56 +0100
From: "Imported For: Class. Quantum Grav. --By: IOPP.API" <cqg@-->
To: igor.bogdanov@-->

Ref: CQG/119461/PAP

24 August 2001

Dr I Bogdanov
Laboratoire Gevrey de Mathematique
Universite de Bourgogne
5 avenue de Montespan
75016 Paris

Dear Dr Bogdanov

TITLE: Topological theory of the initial ...
AUTHORS: G Bogdanov et al

We are pleased to inform you that we have accepted your article for publication in Classical and Quantum Gravity as a Paper.

COMMENT : It took 7 month of very detailed work before we could address all the questions raised in the various reports and get a version of the paper that could satisfy the referee.

After having read the referee's report, everyone who is familiar with topological field theory would immediately realize that the referee understood perfectly well the paper. His question raised in point 4 demontrates that not only the referee obviously knows the principles of topological field theory but also understood the idea presented in the paper : " The authors' point out the H=0 (or L, which is typical for topological field theories) can, more or less, be viewed as the same as \beta H =0 for \beta =0 (in the limit of infinite temperature)."

IN CONCLUSION : It seems totally unfair to pretend :

1) that the referee did not read the paper
2) that the referee did not understand its content
3) that the referee was not demanding profound corrections and modifications
for the paper to meet the standards of the journal.

Thank you for your attention,

Best regards,


Baez it is who alerted the world to the Bogdanov papers in a posting to Usenet.

"Nothing in any of the Bogdanov's papers suggests that they really understand N = 2 supergravity, Donaldson theory, or KMS states. I'm reasonably familiar with all these topics, and as far I can tell, all they write about them is a mishmash of superficially plausible sentences containing the right buzzwords in approximately the right order. There is no logic or cohesion to what they write," he adds.

The Bogdanovs, according to Baez, lost a plagiarism lawsuit in France and he notes the similarities between the papers published.

Francois Griey adds that one of the publications has now regrets publishing the paper:-

I come to the conclusion that it seems very unlikely this is all a deliberate hoax from the Bogdanoff brothers, contrary to what you suggest.

It is more like being famous and eloquent make things (including getting a PhD with a questionable memorandum) become easier.

"And it looks like they managed to match Sokal's trick of inserting at least one obviously false claim into their mix, when they claim that Foucault's pendulum can't be explained by classical or relativistic Physics," notes our valued correspondent Bill Softky.

A hoax? A breakdown in the peer review process? Or neither?

"They are no better (but no worse) than several theoretical physisicts friends of ours who often use some mathematical terminology that they do not master well enough... The result being that their own scientific contribution is conceptually vague and therefore 'not even wrong'," writes Robert Coquereaux in a sympathetic update here. There's a dialog with the Bog.Bros. at the same page, here.

Finally, thanks to reader Tim Sansom who discovered this splendid research paper. [247kb PDF, or use Google's HTML rendering]. How high does this rank on your bogometer?. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Win a year’s supply of chocolate (no tech knowledge required)
Over £200 worth of the good stuff up for grabs
Facebook's Zuckerberg in EBOLA VIRUS FIGHT: Billionaire battles bug
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contacted as site supremo coughs up
Space exploration is just so lame. NEW APPS are mankind's future
We feel obliged to point out the headline statement is total, utter cobblers
Red Bull does NOT give you wings, $13.5m lawsuit says so
Website letting consumers claim $10 cash back crashes after stampede
Down-under record: Australian gets $140k for pussy
'Tiffany' closes deal - 'it's more common to offer your wife', says agent
Internet finally ready to replace answering machine cassette tape
It's a simple message and I'm leaving out the whistles and bells
Swiss wildlife park serves up furry residents to visitors
'It's ecological' says spokesman, now how would you like your Bambi done?
The iPAD launch BEFORE it happened: SPECULATIVE GUFF ahead of actual event
Nerve-shattering run-up to the pre-planned known event
STONER SHEEP get the MUNCHIES after feasting on £4k worth of cannabis plants
Baaaaaa! Fanny's Farm's woolly flock is high, maaaaaan
prev story


Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Win a year’s supply of chocolate
There is no techie angle to this competition so we're not going to pretend there is, but everyone loves chocolate so who cares.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.