Feeds

Brocade and Emulex go unified

'Just good friends' as they dance the night away

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

The Register's new Enterprise Storage Channel

Brocade (www.brocade.com) has stepped up its plans to dominate the Fibre Channel market by agreeing with Emulex (www.emulex.com) to integrate the latter's Fibre Channel host bus adapters (HBAs) into Brocade's intelligent switched SAN fabric, via free firmware upgrades to be available early next year.

The two companies say that unifying the intelligence of the switches and HBAs will make SAN management easier, as well as improving SAN security.

"This is about taking existing SAN elements and unlocking their intelligence from edge to edge," says Brocade CEO Greg Reyes. He adds that it simplifies storage management and also extends the SAN security model to the HBAs, allowing them to use strong authentication and digital certificates when logging onto the SAN fabric.

The deal also ties in with Brocade's relationship with Hewlett Packard, as it allows Brocade switches and Emulex HBAs to be managed via HP OpenView, without the need for a software agent on each server.

Emulex president and COO Kirk Roller says that the technology developed by Brocade and Emulex has been offered for ratification as a standard called the Fabric Device Management Interface (FDMI). This will allow any HBA to be managed as part of the SAN fabric, as long as it complies with the FDMI specifications.

There have been suggestions that Brocade might acquire Emulex in order to become an end-to-end supplier, but it is not clear that this would bring any great advantages or synergy.

For now, Brocade's aim seems to be to put pressure on competitors such as QLogic, which sells both switches and HBAs, while at the same time following Emulex into the midrange and departmental SAN market.

Mark Woithe, business alliance director at HBA developer JNI, is sceptical. "Emulex is in the Windows server space and Brocade wants to be there, but it needs a lower cost SilkWorm switch to sell into that second tier market," he says.

Brocade has announced the SilkWorm 3900, but this is a 32-port enterprise fabric switch, at the same per-port price as its 16-port enterprise models.

"The right solution for the departmental market might be the Vixel approach of embedding a switch chip inside the storage box, so there's no separate switch," adds Woithe.

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
AWS pulls desktop-as-a-service from the PC
Support for PCoIP protocol means zero clients can run cloudy desktops
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.