The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Root server DoS attack slows net

Cache for questions

  • print
  • alert

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

A denial of service attack on the Internet's root DNS servers that began last night continues to vex users today.

The DNS servers resolve names queries to numbers, and the slowdown should only be apparent the first time a user hits a site. After that, your ISP's cache ought to bypass the issue.

The attack highlights the importance of DNS and its consequent vulnerability.

Over at IcannWatch, Michael Froomkin revives Karl Auerbach's proposal of a CD-based "DNS in a box" for such emergencies.

"The proposed CD would have contained the configuration files for BIND plus zone files for a root and selected contents of the big TLDs, plus some sort of wildcard for in-addr.arpa.... but it would have dented ICANN's claim to being uniquely necessary, and besides the idea came from the wrong source," observes Froomkin.

Last year ICANN vowed to take security seriously, and after the latest attack it ought to explain why this is such a bad idea.®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

More from The Register

 breaking news
BBC-featured call centre slapped with hefty fine for unwanted calls
PPI pests: Swansea-based firm stung for £225k by ICO
Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news
Facebook RSS reader said to uncloak June 20
Secret event scooped by Scottish developer?
 breaking news
O2 averts strike action over mass Capita outsourcing deal
Details of new agreement not yet released