Feeds

IBM announces 64-bit PowerPC processor

Big chip Apple bound?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Apple can look forward to a boost in speed and performance after news emerged of IBM's plans to produce a 1.8GHz 64-bit PowerPC processor next year. Maybe.

The PowerPC 970 will be a scaled down version of IBM's Power4 server chips and will be able to run both 32-bit and 64-bit applications. The desktop-orientated part is expected to find a home in Apple PCs in a move which could see its machines leapfrog x86 desktops in performance, albeit at a much higher price.

That much is speculation, for now, since customers for the part remain unannounced and since Apple faces a sizeable number of technical issues in the transition, as our August article (IBM lays desktop PowerPC on Cupertino lawn) explains.

Mac PowerPC CPUs currently reach up to 1.25GHz, compared to 2.8GHz for the fastest Pentium 4 processors. AMD's 64-bit Hammer processors, due early next year, are designed with servers - rather than desktops - in mind.

IBM is expected to flesh out technical details of the processor at this week's Microprocessor Forum. ®

Related stories

IBM lays desktop PowerPC on Cupertino lawn
Power 4 the People

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.