Feeds

Siebel 7 performance issues revealed by user

Customers? Who needs 'em!

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

ComputerWire: IT Industry Intelligence

Rumors of performance issues with the Siebel 7.0 client, which have been circulating for several months, were yesterday confirmed by one of Siebel Systems Incs' biggest customers.

During a presentation outlining Reuters Ltd's migration from version 6.3 of the Siebel software to Siebel 7, at the company's UK user group conference, Reuters' ecommerce director Dave Weller revealed that, in general, response times at the desktop using Siebel 7.0 were slower than they were under Reuters' previous implementation, version 6.3.

The news is particularly embarrassing for San Mateo, California-based Siebel because the company made much of the performance-related benefits accruing from its SmartWeb architecture and zero footprint client when Siebel 7 was launched last year.

At the time it said performance was much improved under SmartWeb because in contrast to classic HTML clients, client-side layout and data were retrieved separately so when a page was loaded for a second time, only the data need to be loaded.

"Performance is still an issue," said Weller. "Some transactions are faster, others are slower. It is probably because of the way the configuration has changed and it will be solved."

He said the system was sluggish with Siebel 7 transactions slower than 6.3 but again hoped to address these issues by further tuning. He indicated that the problems were largely confined to the desktop rather than areas such as database access.

Siebel is aware of the problem and is shipping an option pack to address the issue and Weller is confident that the issue will be resolved. Siebel said the patch should significantly improve performance taking response times of 2 to 2.5 seconds closer to the 1 to 1.5-second mark.

However, Weller also commented on the need for surprisingly high client-side hardware specifications indicating that while the Siebel client was thin client by architecture it was not thin in terms of design.

To achieve reasonable end user response times, desktop machines needed developer-like specifications. Despite the problems Reuters remains pleased with Siebel 7 and the migration program it is undergoing in conjunction with Siebel's services branch.

© ComputerWire

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.