Feeds

McAfee.com rejects NAI bid (again)

Who will rid us of this turbulent bidder?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

ComputerWire: IT Industry Intelligence

McAfee.com Corp may be considering ways it could force former parent Network Associates Inc to withdraw its unwanted acquisition bid, after 96% of shareholders rejected NAI's buyout offer yesterday,

Kevin Murphy and Matthew Aslett write

.

But there remains some confusion on whether McAfee.com has ruled out a "poison pill" shareholder rights plan, or even if it is permitted to adopt one.

NAI yesterday extended its tender offer to acquire the 25% of McAfee.com it does not already own, after only 4% of McAfee.com shareholders tendered their shares before Tuesday's deadline. At market close Tuesday, McAfee.com shares traded at $13.79, about 20% higher than NAI's offer of 0.90 shares for every McAfee.com share.

"We had an inkling that it could be a strong showing against NAI, but we didn't realize it would be so strong," McAfee.com CEO Srivats Sampath told ComputerWire. "It's a pathetic performance by any standard. They need to get serious about the offer, or they should walk... this is bordering on irresponsible."

Asked if McAfee will force NAI to terminate its offer by implementing a shareholder rights plan, Sampath said: "We could, there are multiple options available... we have to go see about what options are available to us as a company... We're going to take it one day at a time."

He added that the company originally decided against a poison pill in order to give shareholders their chance to vote without company intervention.

However, NAI executive VP and general counsel Kent Roberts told ComputerWire that McAfee.com's board had committed not to adopt a shareholder rights plan in order for the offer to go ahead. He also said that such a plan would not be enforcable.

At a meeting shortly before the current offer was made, the McAfee.com board agreed not to adopt "structural defenses that would prohibit the consideration of the offer by the McAfee.com stockholders," according to regulatory filings.

"We had an agreement from the board not to do that," Roberts said. He added that NAI believes any poison pill would be legally "unenforceable", as it would be an "impermissible dliution" of NAI's 85% majority position in McAfee.com. The two companies have discussed this at length, according to regulatory filings.

NAI will only buy the tendered shares if it can secure 90% of them, at which point it can execute a "short form" acquisition - a fast-track merger under the laws of Delaware, where both companies are incorporated. However, NAI's offer will be automatically terminated if McAfee.com adopts a shareholder rights plan.

It could be in McAfee.com's best interests to force such a move, assuming it is able to. The company feels its share price has been artificially depressed by the lingering threat of an NAI acquisition since March. A leap in price, reflecting recent good news at the company, could occur if NAI's offer is taken off the table.

Naturally, NAI wants to bring McAfee.com back into the fold as cheaply as possible, and yesterday said it has extended the offer until August 13, but has not increased the offer price. Both companies agree that recombining the company has "long-term benefits", and a merger seems ultimately inevitable.

The only issue is the price. NAI's Roberts said that McAfee's shareholders will take another look at the offer and see that it is the best deal, despite the current "market speculation" that has caused share price fluctuations that make the deal look worse. "We've been offering a premium on their share price since the beginning," he said.

While McAfee.com's share price fell on the news that the tender offer had been rejected, it was still trading above $13, while NAI's share price also slid and continues to trade below $12. Unless McAfee.com's share price drops suddenly, or NAI's starts to climb, NAI will have to up its offer to more than a single share, or make a cash offer, if it is to reacquire the portion of McAfee.com it spun off via IPO in 1999.

NAI's first attempt to reacquire McAfee.com was launched in March 2002. The initial offer of 0.675 of an NAI share was rejected by the McAfee.com board just a week later, and in April was upped to 0.78 of a share. That offer was accepted by McAfee.com's board but was dropped after NAI became the subject of a regulatory probe. In early July, NAI relaunched its offer of 0.78 of a share, before upping it to 0.90 of a share in mid-July due to the negative effect of share price fluctuations on its overall value.

© ComputerWire

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.