Feeds

Red Hat lowers losses

Taps HP For enterprise market

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

ComputerWire: IT Industry Intelligence

Red Hat Inc, the Linux software and services firm, yesterday reported that it reduced its loss in its first fiscal quarter and increased its revenue sequentially, but saw a decreased top line year-on-year as it reduced its focus on embedded systems in favor of the enterprise market.

For the three months to May 31, the Raleigh, North Carolina-based company recorded a net loss of $4.3m, compared to a loss of $42.3m in the fourth quarter and a loss of $27.6m a year ago, on revenue that was up 5% sequentially and down 9% annually at $19.5m.

The company announced at the same time that it has expanding its Advanced Server reseller deal with Hewlett-Packard Co, one of its key channels into the enterprise market. HP will be the first company to sell Itanium 2-based servers running Linux, Red Hat said. The deal also extends to all HP ProLiant servers and blade servers.

Red Hat has been increasing its focus on the high-end enterprise market, with its Advanced Server as the cornerstone of the strategy. In the first quarter, the company managed to increase its enterprise subscriptions sequentially 6% to $9.6m, down 1% year-on-year. Enterprise services were up about 10% and 44% at $7.8m.

The company's embedded systems business has been suffering as a result. Subscription revenue from embedded Linux was down 35% at $1m, flat sequentially. Last year, Red Hat announced its strategy of focusing on Unix-to-Linux migration opportunities in the high-end market, and restructured its embedded division as a result.

For the current second fiscal quarter, Red Hat now sees revenue in the $21.8m to $22.4m range, with enterprise revenue making up 90-92% of revenues and subscriptions making up 53% of enterprise revenue. The firm expects operating expenses of $16m to $16.4m and a net loss at the GAAP level of $3.3m to $3.8m.

© ComputerWire

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.