Feeds

Panrix goes titsup – again

Liquidation this time

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Panrix, has gone bust again. But this time, there's no escape hatch. The Leeds system builder has gone into Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation, calling on accountancy firm Wilson Pitts to wind up the company's affairs.

Liquidator Philip Deyes who was appointed yesterday said it was too soon to estimate liabilities, creditors' dividends etc. or to supply a reason for Panrix Technologies' collapse.

This information should be ready on June 18, when a creditors' meeting is called, he said.

Panrix went bust for the first time in May 2001. The owner Gulberg Panesar made an offer for the assets of the company and set up again as Panrix Technologies.

Panrix is believed to have been struggling from lack of business, if the fire sale prices on ads in last month's PC Pro is anything to go by.

Meanwhile, the future of the rather more prominent Dan Technology is still up in the air. The company last Friday was locked in talks with BDO Stoy Hayward, but no administrators have been appointed at time of writing. ®

Related stories

Dan Technology teeters on the brink
Panrix boss starts plugging new Panrix business

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.