Feeds

Panrix goes titsup – again

Liquidation this time

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Panrix, has gone bust again. But this time, there's no escape hatch. The Leeds system builder has gone into Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation, calling on accountancy firm Wilson Pitts to wind up the company's affairs.

Liquidator Philip Deyes who was appointed yesterday said it was too soon to estimate liabilities, creditors' dividends etc. or to supply a reason for Panrix Technologies' collapse.

This information should be ready on June 18, when a creditors' meeting is called, he said.

Panrix went bust for the first time in May 2001. The owner Gulberg Panesar made an offer for the assets of the company and set up again as Panrix Technologies.

Panrix is believed to have been struggling from lack of business, if the fire sale prices on ads in last month's PC Pro is anything to go by.

Meanwhile, the future of the rather more prominent Dan Technology is still up in the air. The company last Friday was locked in talks with BDO Stoy Hayward, but no administrators have been appointed at time of writing. ®

Related stories

Dan Technology teeters on the brink
Panrix boss starts plugging new Panrix business

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.