Feeds

Red Hat clarifies stance on software patents

I'll see your fifty and raise you a hundred

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Linux distributor Red Hat has posted a statement on its Web site explaining why it both speaks out against software patents and seeks them.

"Software patents generally impede innovation in software development and....are inconsistent with open source/free software," the document begins.

The company also acknowledges that patents can be used as weapons to impede competitors. Red Hat's stated intent in making patent applications of its own is to use them as a defensive weapon against patent abusers. The theory here is that this will help ensure that closed-source freeloaders can be sued.

"A relatively small number of very large companies have amassed large numbers of software patents. We believe such massive software patent portfolios are ripe for misuse because of the questionable nature of many software patents generally and because of the high cost of patent litigation. One defense against such misuse is to develop a corresponding portfolio of software patents for defensive purposes."

And to back that up the company has issued a pledge not to defend its patents against use in open source products. So long as the terms of the GNU General Public License v2.0; IBM Public License v1.0; Common Public License v0.5; Q Public License v1.0; or any Red Hat open source license are followed, you're good to go.

While this is hardly binding in perpetuity, it's a pledge that the company will find very difficult to back away from in future, so for now it looks like a good thing.

As for its effectiveness as a defence against the big carnivores of the computing savannah, we're not quite so sure. It's rather hard to picture a company the size of Red Hat defending patents against infringement by companies the size of Microsoft or Sun and their vast legions of shysters. But we do admire a good bluff. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Munich considers dumping Linux for ... GULP ... Windows!
Give a penguinista a hug, the Outlook's not good for open source's poster child
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft cries UNINSTALL in the wake of Blue Screens of Death™
Cache crash causes contained choloric calamity
Time to move away from Windows 7 ... whoa, whoa, who said anything about Windows 8?
Start migrating now to avoid another XPocalypse – Gartner
Eat up Martha! Microsoft slings handwriting recog into OneNote on Android
Freehand input on non-Windows kit for the first time
You'll find Yoda at the back of every IT conference
The piss always taking is he. Bastard the.
HANA has SAP cuddling up to 'smaller partners'
Wanted: algorithm wranglers, not systems giants
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.