Feeds

Kill the MSN Messenger

Instant Messenger clients in 'critical' security update

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Microsoft has issued a 'critical' security update after the discovery of a buffer overflow vulnerability which may allow an attacker to execute malicious code against the majority of MSN Messenger users.

The problem stems from a flaw in an ActiveX control, called MSN Chat, which is included with MSN Messenger since version 4.5 and Exchange Instant Messenger. MSN Chat allows groups of users to gather in a single, virtual location online to engage in text messaging.

Researchers at eEye Digital Security have discovered that an unchecked buffer exists in one of the functions that handles input parameters in the MSN Chat control. Because of this users enticed to open a maliciously crafted HTML mail or visit a maliciously constructed Web site might potentially fall victim to attack.

In mitigation, Microsoft states that Outlook Express 6.0 and the Outlook Email Security Update and can thwart such attacks through their default security settings. It also points out that the version of Windows Messenger which ships with Windows XP does not include the MSN Chat control.

This still leaves a vast number of people vulnerable (Outlook Email Security Update take-up is worryingly low, witness the continuing spread of email worms it was designed to stop) so it is not without good reason that Microsoft defines the update as 'critical'.

The vulnerability is ripe for exploitation and of a type that means it is likely to hand around for some time before people wake up to the problem.

Buffer overflows are a common class of security vulnerability, associated with sloppy programming, which allow arbitrary and potentially malicious code to be injected into a system through a carefully crafted, malformed data entry.

Generally, this spurious input is much longer than a program expects, causing code to overflow the buffer, crash a process and enter parts of a system where it may be subsequently executed. ®

External Links

Microsoft's security advisory

Related stories

EDS bans IM

Instant message, cracker tricks
MS issues monster IE security fix
FBI lists 20 most dangerous Internet security holes

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Shellshock: 'Larger scale attack' on its way, warn securo-bods
Not just web servers under threat - though TENS of THOUSANDS have been hit
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Hackers thrash Bash Shellshock bug: World races to cover hole
Update your gear now to avoid early attacks hitting the web
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.