Feeds

Cisco and Sophos spoofed in virus mail-outs

Forged infected email

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Cisco Systems has written to users to warn against forged messages containing computer viruses which purport to come from its Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT).

Several forged virus bearing emails apparently from psirt@cisco.com have been sent out, one of which (containing an infected attachment 'width.pif') was received by The Register this morning. These messages are not authentic and can be safely ignored, Cisco advises.

Cisco is "aware of these emails and is actively looking at solutions to reduce or eliminate the forged messages", it said in a notice to subscribers of the list this evening.

Authentic Cisco messages on the moderated mailing list can be identified by a PGP signature and will originate from a verified "cisco.com" address, it advises.

Similarly spoofed email messages infected with the Klez virus have forced AV vendor Sophos to deny any responsibility in the wider distribution of the virus.

The recent Klez-H worm uses its own SMTP engine, and can appear to have come from any email address, it advises.

Some of its other customers have also reported receiving an unsolicited email apparently from Sophos claiming to contain disinfection tools for the W32/ElKern virus.

These emails contain a copy of the Klez-G worm and, again, do not originate from Sophos, the company states.

Sophos recommends that users do not open or launch unsolicited executable attachments and keep their anti-virus software updated.

Computer users are also advised to consider installing a patch from Microsoft which should fix a vulnerability in some versions of Outlook, Outlook Express, and Internet Explorer that is exploited by Klez-H and a number of other viruses.

After a slow start, spread of the Klez-H worm has reached near epidemic proportions. Managed services firm MessageLabs reports blocking more than 200,000 virus infected emails destined for its customers, since the virus first appeared last week. ®

Related stories

Klez worm infects and infuriates
Newmedia agency cleared of spreading worm
Sophos rebuffs virus-spreading charge
Norton AV update rings false alarm bells
Symantec spills email addresses of list subscribers
How secure is CA's security mailing list?
Virus writers outpace traditional AV

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Hackers thrash Bash Shellshock bug: World races to cover hole
Update your gear now to avoid early attacks hitting the web
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.