Feeds

US Supremes affirm virtual child porn

No harm, no foul

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday delivered a blow to prudes throughout the land, when it ruled 6-3 that sexual material which doesn't involve the abuse of actual children is legal.

At issue was the Child Pornography Prevention Act, which Congress passed in 1996 to purge society of dangerous images and ideas.

The Act would have outlawed anything which 'appears to depict' an underage person in a sexual act. That would mean a movie scene where young-looking adult actors give the impression that teenagers are doing the deed. We've seen that in scores of films like "Endless Love", "Fast Times at Ridgemont High", "Lolita", and even the recent "Traffic" (in which, ironically, a conservative US Senator Orrin Hatch appears as himself in a brief cameo). It would also cover realistic-looking art.

Part of the rationale behind the Act was to prevent children from being exposed to images and performances which might suggest to them that having sex with Uncle or with Coach is a fab idea, and quite popular among their peers.

According to Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion, "the mere tendency of speech to encourage unlawful acts is not a sufficient reason for banning it."

The Court also observed that speech and art would be preempted out of fear. "Few legitimate movie producers or book publishers, or few other speakers in any capacity, would risk distributing images in or near the uncertain reach of this law,'' Justice Kennedy wrote.

US Attorney General John Ashcroft whinged during a press conference that prosecuting KP perverts will become "immeasurably more difficult" now that it will be necessary to prove that an objectionable image or performance is the real thing. Apparently, the DoJ has been prosecuting people for materials it isn't quite sure are actual child porn. This will have to stop. But the Lord Protector said he would do his best to tack on other recognized offenses to keep current prosecutions from evaporating.

It is of course still extremely illegal to produce or possess pornography which involves the sexual abuse of children, or which uses the image of an actual, identifiable child in such materials, but simulations are acceptable. Score one for the porn lobby. ®

Related Story

US Supremes mull future of Net porn

Related Links

The Act's objectionable passage
The Supreme Court opinions

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
NSA mass spying reform KILLED by US Senators
Democrats needed just TWO more votes to keep alive bill reining in some surveillance
'Internet Freedom Panel' to keep web overlord ICANN out of Russian hands – new proposal
Come back with our internet! cries Republican drawing up bill
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Driving business with continuous operational intelligence
Introducing an innovative approach offered by ExtraHop for producing continuous operational intelligence.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?