Feeds

AMD aims high in Hannover

three new Athlons

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

CeBIT AMD announced three new high-end CPUs, coinciding nicely with the first day at CeBIT, the world's biggest computer show.

On parade is the Athlon XP 2100+ for desktops, which gets a huge thumbs-up from Tom's Hardware. This clocks in at 1733MHz, but outstrips faster clocking Intel P4s, THG says. However it notes that the processor is "maxed out on performance" with the Palomino core at least while using the 0.18m pmanufacturing process. Roll on the upcoming cooler Thoroughbred core.

The other two CPU launches are the AMD Athlon MP processor 2000+ for servers and workstations; and the mobile AMD Athlon 4 processor 1600+ for notebook PCs. The first two are available immediately with Compaq, Fujitsu Siemens, and NEC-CI lined up to produce desktops based on the new desktop Athlon, and Racksaver and BOXX taking the server CPU.

The new mobile Athlon will be available soon "on a configure-to-order basis, with retail availability to follow," AMD says. Compaq has signalled its intention to offer the new mobile Athlon in its notebook line-up.

In 1K tray quantities the Athlon XP 2100+ costs $420, the AMD Athlon MP 2000+ costs $415, and the mobile AMD Athlon 4 processor 1600+ cost $380. ®

External links

AMD press release

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.