Feeds

Security suppliers compared to dodgy car mechanics

Wide boys and clueless vendors contribute to 30% security overspend

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Many anxious users are being duped by unscrupulous or clueless suppliers into buying security products they don't need.

That's the view of security consultancy MIS Corporate Defence, which reckons almost 30 per cent of current security spend in Europe is misplaced or wasted on ad-hoc purchases.

The average security breach costs companies an estimated £16,000 and MIS is quick to stress the need for basic security precautions, which some firms only make after they've been hit. The problem is that unless end users have a basic understanding of security, which means better education, they might misplace their trust in vendors, who might not always have their best interests at heart.

Mark Read, a professional services consultant at MIS Corporate Defence, said that talking to a security vendor was much like talking to a car mechanic.

"If people don't understand how a car works, it's much easier to sell them things that they don't need. The same is true of security," Read told us.

Users should seek to get a clear business reason why they need a piece of technology, Read advises. Bad advice does not always stem from avarice - lack of knowledge about appropriate solutions from suppliers "who have jumped on the security bandwagon" can also lead to problems.

As an example of the kind of security "overkill" MIS is cautioning against, Read reports instances when he discovered the internet connection of a two user branch office was protected by an enterprise class Cisco PIX firewall.

MIS analysis is partially backed up by research by Datamonitor, which discovered that 80 per cent of firewalls fail to perform the task for which they were purchased, primarily due to poor configuration and a lack of advice from suppliers.

Intrusion detection technology was another area where end users can end up with a system that fails to match their requirements, but the issue goes over the whole range of security spending, according to MIS. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Shellshock: 'Larger scale attack' on its way, warn securo-bods
Not just web servers under threat - though TENS of THOUSANDS have been hit
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Hackers thrash Bash Shellshock bug: World races to cover hole
Update your gear now to avoid early attacks hitting the web
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.