Feeds

Yahoo! wrests HotJobs from Monster.com

They want you for a new recruit

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

Yahoo! is to become the world's second biggest online recruitment business, following the successful snatch of HotJobs from the hands of TMP Worldwide.

Yahoo! made a surprise eleventh hour $436m cash-and-shares bid for Hot Jobs, trumping an agreed offer from TMP, owner of Monster.com, the world's biggest online recruitment business.

Yesterday, TMP said it would not raise its offer, effectively withdrawing its hat from the ring. HotJobs will pay the company $15m and $2m in expenses for terminating the agreement.

This year's downturn in online advertising in the US has brought home the vulnerability of even the biggest banner ad-led biggest portals. Yahoo!'s response is to target an increase in non-advertising revenues to 50 per cent-plus of turnover, up from 20 per cent today.

It appears to show little interest in building a substantial Web-access business, which, if done correctly, transforms the economics of running a major portal. Neither does it seem terribly keen on getting into the publishing business, AOL-style. So the obvious alternative strategy is to transform itself from an advertising platform for others into a dealer on its own account.

By acting as principal rather than intermediary, Yahoo! can bulk up on turnover and profits and ensure more predictable revenues. A strong balance sheet means that the company should be able to comfortably cover extra working capital needs.

The downside is that the company risks alienating advertisers - presumably rival job boards will lose their appetite for advertising with Yahoo! While Yahoo! maintained its own job board before the HotJobs purchase, this could not be said to be a threat to mainstream players.

However, the sheer size of HotJobs, and the discrete quality of online recruitment will ensure that, on this occasion, risk is minimised for Yahoo!. It can afford to shrug off advertising losses on this score. ®

Related Stories

Yahoo! wants! HotJobs!
Monster swallows HotJobs

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.