Feeds

C&W slides away from ASP

No demand, no service

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Cable & Wireless backed away from the ASP (application service provider) sector yesterday leaving the immature market for such services looking positively juvenile.

The withdrawal is a sorry blow to the already battered ASP market. C&W is one of the first of the larger, internationally-known organisations to launch and subsequently pull out of the ASP model. But as C&W notes, it didn't pull away from ASP because it was a bad idea; the market simply wasn't ready. The messag then is that C&W may bounce back into ASP when the time is right.

The telco told CRN US that it still firmly believed in the ASP model but, in a word of caution to firms operating this niche, stated that it had received very little interest in ASP services from its customers.

The decision then is a simple case of supply and demand. Cable and Wireless had no demand so it isn't going to do ASP. The company hasn't reported what will happen to existing customers, if indeed there are any, but it's doubtful that any will be dumped.

C&W kicked off the ASP programme in 2000 on the back of an agreement from Compaq, which came in as the hardware supplier. At the time the companies said they were investing $500m over five years in the project to sell Internet service package to small and medium businesses.

Many ASPs came to the table with hugely impressive offerings, from customised packages – of off-the-shelf software – to incredible SLAs (service level agreements). And plenty of them built very impressive data centres. Since the stuttering take-up however many ASPs have either gone to the wall or retrenched into simple, bulk order applications – Office, Exchange, Sage – which they can manage more cost effectively.

© IT-Analysis.com

Related stories

Pure ASPs face rough ride - BT
ASPs are the next big thing, after all
ASPs no defence against piracy liability
What is this thing called ASP?
Compaq and C&W hop on ASP bandwagon

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.