The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Four in five corporate emails are junk

Spread the gossip

  • print
  • alert

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

A service which helps employers to assess how their email policies comply with business needs and legal requirements is launched today.

The operator of the Email Auditing Programme (EAP), security consultancy Peapod, reckons that up to four in five corporate emails are junk. In trials of the new service, Peapod found one firm where just 21 per cent of email traffic was work-related.

Similar findings were reported with other beta customers - pointing to businesses paying a heavy price for non-productive email use, Peapod claims.

With EAP, Peapod consultants monitor email traffic over client networks, usually for a week. They provide the client with detailed reports of network usage and a cost analysis of the non-productive traffic. Based on this analysis, Peapod works with customers to devise appropriate policies and strategies. EAP costs around £15,000 for 10,000 In-boxes.

Personal use of corporate email would be considered a misuse of corporate resources by many firms, according to Thomas. Heavy use of personal emails is in the same category as excessive personal phone calls or using the office franking machine to send Xmas cards, he argues.

Firms commonly apply content management technology (such as MIMEsweeper) to reduce the risk of disseminating pornographic content, racist material or email which might fall foul of the law.

But this was a "kneejerk" reaction to reducing risk unless it was combined with an understanding of current mail usage or business requirements, Peapod says.

Such knowledge is needed to fine tune the technology and, more importantly, to create email policies and strategies limiting non-business use, while keeping employers on the right side of the law.

A network of legal firms advises Peapod on legal issues, such as how to ensure that content for monitoring is established and how to write email policies into staff handbooks and employment contracts.

Stephen Mason, barrister and legal director of Ikan (a Peapod partner), said that balancing the rights of individuals under the Human Rights Act and Data Protection Act with the needs of business is like "walking through a minefield".

"Whenever anything goes wrong, liability usually falls on the employer rather than the employee."
®

Related Stories

Junk mail costs lives
UK govt wants to decide own spam policy
EU says 'oui' to spam
Home Office extends online snooping laws
Employers put the squeeze on porn surfers
MessageLabs launches email porn filtering service
Internet will become 'unusable' by 2008

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

More from The Register

 breaking news
BBC-featured call centre slapped with hefty fine for unwanted calls
PPI pests: Swansea-based firm stung for £225k by ICO
Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news
Facebook RSS reader said to uncloak June 20
Secret event scooped by Scottish developer?
 breaking news
O2 averts strike action over mass Capita outsourcing deal
Details of new agreement not yet released