Feeds

SIS has Rambus chipset in sight despite denials

4i Direct DRAM-based replacement for Intel's Tulloch

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

SIS is still in the running to offer a Rambus chipset for the Pentium 4 despite the denials company executives issued last week.

Industry sources cited by EBN claim that the company has offered to develop a chipset that would support Rambus' quad-channel RDRAM - 4i Direct DRAM - after Intel decided that it wasn't going to produce one of its own.

Intel had planned to introduce Tulloch, a quad-channel Rambus successor to the current 850 chipset, mid-2002. But recently it dropped Tulloch from its roadmaps in favour of an updated version of the 850, codenamed Tehama E, which will support the upcoming 533MHz P4 frontside bus.

SIS was cited as the developer of the first non-Intel PC-oriented RDRAM chipset by unnamed industry sources cited by CNet. Last week, executives quoted by DigiTimes claimed that such a product was "unlikely". As we said at the time, that's hardly a denial and could easily mask a programme to determine whether a market exists for a quad-channel RDRAM chipset. ®

Related Stories

SIS poo-poos Rambus chipset plan
SIS announces DDR400, Pentium 4 chipset
SIS to offer Rambus chipset for Pentium 4?

Related Link

EBN: SiS said to be developing low-cost Rambus chipset

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.