Feeds

RSA WebID agent can't read Unicode

Get your patch now

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Updated RSA's Internet authentication product can be bypassed using a combination of Unicode characters which IIS recognises but RSA's security technology fails to decode.

RSA's WebID agent is supposed to deny access to a corporate intranet until a user is properly authenticated by a SecurID server.

The potentially serious security vulnerability in RSA's product was discovered by ProCheckUp, a UK security consultancy. That is at least according to CERT, but not RSA which said it informed customers of the issue and put out a fix back in July (see below).

In any case, a variation of the same Unicode directory transversal-style exploit would allow a hacker to obtain a directory listing on vulnerable systems. Hackers could knock up a url string featuring Unicode characters that would trick the url filter on RSA's WebID agent and bypass the security software.

Richard Brain, technical director of ProCheckUp, said the vulnerability meant that unauthenticated users could be able to read files and even execute programs on a supposedly secure server.

The issue is important because the Web agent of SecurID is used by government organisations and the like to secure access to intranets or for Outlook Web access.

RSA Security has issued a new release of the C libraries used in SecurID which guards against the flaw, according to ProCheckUp.

Users are advised to get the latest version ACE/Agent for Windows (4.4.3.) or ACE/Agent for Windows 2000 (1.1.2) to protect themselves against the vulnerability. This software can be obtained from the SecureCare online portion of RSA's Web site, which only its customers can access.

Updated

RSA Security has finally been in touch (after a week) to say that it discovered the vulnerability back in July and that ProCheckUp issued its alert without consulting it. This sits oddly with CERT's October 24 alert on the vulnerability and RSA didn't have an immediate explanation of this. ®

Related Link

Security bulletins on the issue by ProCheckUp

Related Stories

Pain in the RSA
SSL toolkit flaw poses risk
RSA takes a long-term risk on safety
RSA poses $200,000 crypto challenge
Internet security firm RSA's Web site hacked

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
FYI: OS X Yosemite's Spotlight tells Apple EVERYTHING you're looking for
It's on by default – didn't you read the small print?
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Microsoft pulls another dodgy patch
Redmond makes a hash of hashing add-on
NOT OK GOOGLE: Android images can conceal code
It's been fixed, but hordes won't have applied the upgrade
Apple grapple: Congress kills FBI's Cupertino crypto kybosh plan
Encryption would lead us all into a 'dark place', claim G-Men
DEATH by PowerPoint: Microsoft warns of 0-day attack hidden in slides
Might put out patch in update, might chuck it out sooner
'LulzSec leader Aush0k' found to be naughty boy not worthy of jail
15 months home detention leaves egg on feds' faces as they grab for more power
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.