Feeds

W3C denies misleading world+dog on RAND license status

But it's already in Beta

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Build a business case: developing custom apps

The W3C today denied that it has misled the web community on the status of its controversial RAND license, but confirmed to us that RAND was effectively already in "beta".

In its FAQ in support of the pay-to-play web standard RAND licensing policy, the W3C emphasizes "NOTE: The W3C is not presently aware of any non-free patent that is essential to any existing W3C recommendation." And Danny Weitzner reiterated this to The Register yesterday, telling us, "...we observed some general trends, and concluded that we should at least think about RAND."

However Linux kernel hacker Daniel Phillips, has pointed out that a draft version of the RAND license has been part of private discussions since April 5. On the SVG Patent Statements Page IBM, Apple, Kodak and Quark declare for RAND licenses. Kodak named a patent that could be an issue. Phillips today repeated his call to fork the SVG specification today.

How can we square the two viewpoints?

Janet Daly of the W3C says it's a "mischaracterization" to say that RAND is already on the table.

"We were able to test a draft and see what issues arose," she told us.

"What we've hoped to do in applying the early version of the Patent Policy Draft to existing Working Groups is identify patent issues early. Remember that there was no official declared mode for the SVG working group and it's now a RF group. Kodak said the patent they'd identified was non essential, and will help produce open source implementations."

Weitzner added that a RAND would identify earlier, rather than later, any patent issues.

"RAND is part of our environment, without being a policy," he told us today. "Remember that there's nothing in the W3C's procedures that says a specification should be either RF or RAND."

His view concurs with many opponents of RAND - that RAND licenses would most likely sink in the marketplace. "But rather than just bumbling along, people can identify the patents".

That's not enough to satisfy free software community.

We've been searching for common ground, and noticed a couple of things.

While there's probably much shared philosophical agreement that web standards don't work when there are royalties attached, or when there are submarine patents waiting in the dock, and much agreement that public opprobrium is the best way to counter punitive patents, there's little agreement on tactics: on where the best time and place is to bring these into the open, so the public can throw embalming fluids at the perpetrators.

And there's even less appreciation on how much damage RAND could do to the free software movement.

"You can't license a patent encumbered standard under the GPL," says Philips, who dismisses Kodak's concession to produce an open source implementation as too vague a promise.

"We have to do a good job on researching patents and we have to move rapidly when a submarine comes up, to embarrass the company with the patent," he says.

"But there's got to be no compromise on RAND. Only RF is acceptable - and that applies to the IETF as well." ®

Related Stories

We'll fork the Web to keep it Free - Perens
Web standards schism "terrible" - W3C patent policy boss
The free Web's over, as W3C blesses Net patent taxes

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Microsoft exits climate denier lobby group
ALEC will have to do without Redmond, it seems
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.